{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Wes:
10/14/2022 4:33:46 AM
64
"With MnK having higher stability, accuracy, and auto-aim..."
Huh. Interesting...
So controller gives you reticle friction and a some help if you miss.
MnK gives you the precision of MnK and MORE help if you miss (compared to controller) but no reticle friction.
Straight from Bungie.
MnK complaining about controller is kinda sad now to be honest. Like yikes. Yeah, controller has reticle friction, but MnK has [i][b][u]more of everything else[/u][/b][/i].
Edit: Clarification here. Not trying to "fuel the fire." My stance is simple: People who need help tracking moving targets need controller. Those that don't go to MnK. And both help you A LOT in D2, more than in any other shooter.
And if you're gonna complain about controller, or MnK for that matter, at least get your facts in order. This "Controller is soft aim-bot" nonsense is just sad and isn't backed by any facts Bungie has provided. Come up with a better discussion, using [i]facts[/i]. Otherwise, as I said, it's sad. Just sad.
Edit 2: "Bungie lies" is also not a very intellectual argument. Surprised I have to say that.
-
11 RepliesThey can use all the terminology they want, pick up one versus the other and the difference is night and day, not saying controller is broken op but the wording in the twab makes controllers sound like the objectively worse input that no one should use which is very much not the case.
