[quote]You’ve got it exactly backwards.
Making everything “solo friendly” will either fragment the game irretrievably or make team activities trivial.
Here’s a better thought: quit expecting everything to be tailored to you. If you prefer solo play, and are hard-over that everything must be available to the solo player, [i]then play a single-person game. [/i] I’d, like me, you always play solo but like some of the multiplayer games, [i]accept that you won’t be able to achieve everything.[/i][/quote]
You should read the post BEFORE you comment. No one said make [b]everything[/b] solo friendly, that’s just your new hyperbole strawman. Sols didn’t even say that he expected everything to be catered to him.
Remember:
READ
THINK
Then
POST
English
-
You need to quit following me around the forums with your pathetic attempts to harass me. Not only is it not working, but you keep showcasing your complete inability to think. OP is, in fact, asking for the game to cater to him. Read. It.
-
Ummm... No.
-
Edited by TattooedOni: 5/28/2019 9:41:58 PM[quote]You need to quit following me around the forums with your pathetic attempts to harass me. Not only is it not working, but you keep showcasing your complete inability to think. OP is, in fact, asking for the game to cater to him. Read. It.[/quote] You need to stop posting on the most popular current post then, because when you do it’s public and me or anyone else can respond. If you don’t like that system don’t use the forums. That’s not following you. You should read it again because you still don’t understand what the OP is saying. Edit here I’ll quote it so we can read together: [quote]It wouldn't affect your experience one iota, so be maybe stop, put on a thinking cap and contemplate what you're about to say before you post something ignorant. Facts: making the game better for solo play doesn't mean getting rid of team activities or even dumbing them down. What it does mean is -better Matchmaking in PvP environments that are currently extremely unbalanced towards fireteams. -more and/or better matchmaking options for PvE content like Nightfalls, raids and dungeons. -more endgame content like Shattered Throne that can be done solo or in a fireteam and both are a true endgame challenge. If you want to keep having a game to play into the future, you might not want to tell people who experience the game differently than you to "find another game". You also might want to try a little empathy and understanding instead of faux internet basement-rage. Thanks.[/quote] Never mentions himself even once.
-
So your theory is that because OP didn’t use the personal pronoun, he must therefore be speaking completely altruistically as well as in the abstract? What grade are you in? You’ve got a long way to go in terms of critical reading.
-
Edited by TattooedOni: 5/28/2019 9:59:32 PM[quote]So your theory is that because OP didn’t use the personal pronoun, he must therefore be speaking completely altruistically as well as in the abstract? What grade are you in? You’ve got a long way to go in terms of critical reading.[/quote] Never mentioned himself in anyway. This was completely in support of other players. Lol, I see you’re a mind reader. What the OP said and what you say he said are two different things. The proof is right there. You can open up your own straw man factory with how many you can produce in a day.
-
You read at about a middle school level.
-
[quote]You read at about a middle school level.[/quote] I haven’t read at a middle school level since elementary school. Not that reading matters to you since you just make up what other people say anyway.
-
Yes, OP is not talking about himself when he says, [quote] So why are so many people against it? I enjoy playing solo because I get to feel the accomplishment of doing something myself and not having to rely on others to complete an activity. I also don't want to be forced to get together a fireteam every time I want to participate in end game content. [/quote] Right?
-
[quote]Yes, OP is not talking about himself when he says, [quote] So why are so many people against it? I enjoy playing solo because I get to feel the accomplishment of doing something myself and not having to rely on others to complete an activity. I also don't want to be forced to get together a fireteam every time I want to participate in end game content. [/quote] Right?[/quote] That’s not the OP. If you don’t know OP means “original post” or “original poster”. I’ve already quoted the OP to you directly and it doesn’t mention himself at all. Which you know. This is what’s known as grasping at straws. Sorry but it’s not going to make you right.
-
Actually, just a mistake due to the ridiculous threading on the mobile app. But, just this once, you have a point.
-
[quote]Actually, just a mistake due to the ridiculous threading on the mobile app. But, just this once, you have a point.[/quote] Do you read all my posts?
-
Yes, and you seriously have no idea how to logic.
-
[quote]Yes, and you seriously have no idea how to logic.[/quote] See that question has no good answer. Yes means that you cyber stalk my posts. No means you don’t know what you’re talking about. You cleared it up though, stalker it is.
-
In this thread. You just prove you have no idea about the concept of context. I don’t read everything you post; even asking the question is asinine.
-
[quote]In this thread. You just prove you have no idea about the concept of context. I don’t read everything you post; even asking the question is asinine.[/quote] You said you did yourself (It’s quoted publically can’t take it back now),but it turns out both are true: You’re a stalker AND you have no idea what you’re talking about.
-
You really suck as a troll. But it does prove you can’t think, nor read critically.
-
[quote]You really suck as a troll. But it does prove you can’t think, nor read critically.[/quote] Let it go. He can’t hear anything logical. He will do this all day. Ignore the troll
-
-
[quote]You really suck as a troll. But it does prove you can’t think, nor read critically.[/quote] Well lets see, you said I’ve only ever been right once, but you “haven’t” read all my posts (ignorance), but you also said you have read all my posts (stalker). Maybe you should read what people actually write, and not the fantasy you make up in your head, and think critically about it before you hit reply. Actually apply some consistent logic. That would be cool. I’m not a troll, I just don’t agree with you, and I call you out when you’re being a hypocrite who makes hyperbolic strawmen. There is a public record of our entire conversation, and let’s just say it doesn’t make you look like you know how to read.
-
Edited by Inclement Karma: 5/29/2019 7:23:28 PMYes, because when in a thread and you ask if I’d read all your posts, I’m supposed to ignore logic and context in favor of assuming, apropos of nothing, you’ve suddenly decided to ask me if I’ve read everything you’ve ever posted, [i]because[/i], like a child without the concept of context, you assumed when I said you finally got something correct that I’ve suddenly changed gears from the conversation at hand to a philosophical discussion of absolutes. Makes total sense. Edit: tpyo
-
[quote]Yes, because when in a thread and you ask if I’d read all your posts, I’m supposed to ignore logic and context in favor of assuming, apropos of nothing, you’ve suddenly decided to ask me if I’ve read everything you’ve ever posted, [i]because[/i], like a child without the concept of context, you assumed when I said you finally got something correct that I’ve suddenly changed gears from the conversation at hand to a philosophical discussion of absolutes. Makes total sense. Edit: tpyo[/quote] I don’t think you grasp context well enough to insult my grasp of it. The context was YOU saying I had a point for the first time [b][i]ever[/i][/b]. For you to make that claim genuinely (we all know it was just another pathetic attempt at insulting me, but let’s give you the benefit of the doubt) you would have to have read every post I’ve made. I asked if you had read all my posts in a direct reply to that claim. The context is very simple there.
-
Like I said, you read with a child’s understanding of basic conversation.
-
[quote]Like I said, you read with a child’s understanding of basic conversation.[/quote] Yeah, but it wasn’t true the first time you said it, and it never becomes true the more times you say it.
-
[quote][quote]Like I said, you read with a child’s understanding of basic conversation.[/quote] Yeah, but it wasn’t true the first time you said it, and it never becomes true the more times you say it.[/quote] True Oni, but he’s correct. You are a child when someone speaks against your narrative. Actually talk to him about how the solo experience can be improved instead of aggravating people to illicit a negative response. Quit being toxic for once.
-
[quote][quote][quote]Like I said, you read with a child’s understanding of basic conversation.[/quote] Yeah, but it wasn’t true the first time you said it, and it never becomes true the more times you say it.[/quote] True Oni, but he’s correct. You are a child when someone speaks against your narrative. Actually talk to him about how the solo experience can be improved instead of aggravating people to illicit a negative response. Quit being toxic for once.[/quote] Since you seem to think you know what toxic is, you tell me: Is this toxic? https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/252262267/0/0/1 [quote] Sounds like someone is pissy. He has a problem with our one 17 year old clan member. He was in the clan for 5 minutes and quit. Everyone else is 21+. The sad thing is that our young clan member can outplay him in every facet of the game. In summation, this guy was trash.[/quote] Seems pretty toxic to me. Stay in your lane. Karma was being toxic to Sols and making strawmen to attack him over something he didn’t even say. You’re just so desperate to get attention from me you will ignore that to make an ignorant comment. Good work 😎👍