REPLY PRT1: AHA a discussion 2 be had in this user's lonely, uneventful life at almost 4 in the morn (restructuring 2day to get some last minute fantasy basketball lineups in for a shot of getting out of this cesspool and muh fam out of lower-middle-class poverty; not saying this user has it worse than everyone but it still sucks and the gap between poor and rich is widening due to 'the State' and Central Banksters, more on that later)! Okay, first-of-all, thanks for the reply, that was cogent and cordial and well-put. These talking points have been seen before by these eyes so this user feels equipped enough to respond to them equally cogently, if not a bit more loquacious than most, so here's hoping in this user's social inexperience this isn't too long-winded to the point of incoherence. This user was WAITING to see some of the usual 'buzzwords', not to come across as off-putting, such as 'feudalism' and being compared to a baseless animal acting on basic senses and capitalism exploiting people as an inherent quality. Gunna break this down bit-by-bit... Yr heart is in the right place, will say that, this user too feels similarly, if only differing on a few points, mainly due to lexicographical differences (different definitions of words and knowing their true history of usage). As they say, if one is young and not liberal they have no heart, if one is old and not conservative they have no brain. Another one MichlMalice on an episode of the JRE quoting TomWolf is that 'if a conservative is someone who's been mugged a liberal is a person who was arrested'. This user doesn't like these terms, as stated above, and finds labeling such people and things to be counter-productive and a loaded and leading thing to do that then 'bounces' he proverbial 'ball' back into the court of public opinion, namely that of agitprop actors and actresses who professionally strawman random innocent people of whatever 'aisle' for a living to get their audience to engage in a 2 or 5 or 7 minutes 'hate' (a la Orwel's '1984'), offering nothing but 'sugar-and-salt', sugar for their vassals and salt for their enemies for the sake of it because they feel conflict is inevitable and someone's gotta get screwed in a grand game of 'tag' in a world of scarcity when that simply doesn't have to be the case, namely because of the monopoly on credit, arbitration, and defense known as the 'State' (capital S because it's worshiped like a deity, and to differentiate it from 'state' like a condition or ailment someone is in, as one BraveTheWrld/JuliaTouriahnski has made mention of years ago when she was younger). The basic premise is that in a world of scarcity of resources, whatever that resource may be (it doesn't HAVE to be just oil or bananas, it could be a market for spouses or peace-of-mind) that artificial interference in the market (which Doctor TomWoods recently said is incompatible with government) trying to 'game the system' for a few (hyper-nationalism and/or fascism) or all ('globalism' not to be confused with globalization/communism) with centralized collectivization of those resources for distribution, usually via coercion and social- (even genetic-) engineering of either people, as Hitlr spoke of, the means of production, as Staln is (in)famous for, or BOTH, simply DOES NOT WORK, at least unless it's INTENDED NOT to work AT ALL (in which case it works PERFECTLY in such a Malthuhsian nightmare of population control and possibly interstellar gold mining and laundering between proxies and patrons in space and/or Antarctica of some combination of allegedly 64 alien species said to have visited Earth)! Think of it like quicksand or Devl's Snare in HaryPottr near the end. The more one struggles, the quicker they sink. To think it is a consequential absolute that one WILL be screwed in a free market then one must try to game the system with fake money that flawed humans (or otherwise) would/will screw with with quantative easing to achieve dominance over other currencies or monies or wipe them out completely ONLY creates a NEW bourgeoisie and proletariat, merely a different one than the previous one in the cycle. Revenge, pure and simple, at the surface, left-brain-dominant and right-brain-dominant thinking, beneath the surface, as MarkPasio talks about (recommend this credit to humanity HIGHLY). It is NOT a consequential absolute one WILL be screwed in a free market, and even if they are not 'up-to-par', it doesn't necessarily HAVE to be some FytClub Tylr Durdn 'anarcho-primitivist' scenario, as what yuh are describing is called 'egoism' or Stirnrite 'anarcho-egoist' mantra (there's apparently MANY black-flags out there with every color of the rainbow and MORE when most are BS and fall under the GoldandBlack, with RedandBlack (AnComs) being garbage. Concerning 'muh political spectrum', this user thinks of it two ways, one is that no one is further 'right-wing' than AnCap and another is that 'right-wing' is not AnCap and AnCap/libertarian is above such a pitiful spectrum as RobrtHiggs espoused. Depends on one's own spectrum. To this user 'right-wing' means, by definition of AmericanHeritageDictionary 'individualist' or respecting an individual's Rights over some arbitrary imaginary collective (everyone is a minority and there is no majority) and that the 'needs of the few, or the one, 'outweigh' (or at least are not taken precedence all the time OVER by) the needs of the many, a la ST3:TSFS ending scene. 'Leftist' means some group of white people concerned about white people surviving without having drops of black blood or black people concerned about being black and women or [insert characteristic here] coming together just for being women and apparently oppressed and needing each other to survive and ALL hating freedom and individualism and the truth equally having the right to kick out a non-holder or believer of such attributes or characteristics from a given area NOT of their private property. Read AmartyaSehn on identity politics. Even the Great Mughal of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries abhored whatever was not logical and reasonable, even if it was traditional either of IslamicORany other religion or culture (poundsign NOTALL to any anti-semites and/or Islamaphobic peeps out there, EPH6:12, it's not flesh and blood of such levels, psychopaths are born, they are a minority, fragile systems allow them to exploit shyt and create sociopaths with bad ideas, everything is economic, peeps don't go to war over rainbow haired fat chyks or 'wounded' little girls with make-up on). It's ALL market manipulation between competing dynastic families who USE the State to retain their status in society, because a monopoly over credit is the ultimate deciding factor of the trifecta. There's a clip of RiknMortee out there where Prof. Rik sets a space alien currency's value to '0' from '1' and then...well, look it up, it's real life imho in a nutshell. Without government, who is to say this user cannot sell their cell phone for a pencil??? Value is SUBJECTIVE NOT OBJECTIVE (in such regards). Otherwise that's social-engineering NONE of which is required. The interaction BETWEEN those different valuations and how they go down is the issue and having as many OPTIONS to either defend, arbitrate, or value a unit of exchange at the individual level or voluntary third-party representation if not capable of (not all only beautiful, smart, and strong are welcome only, stupid, lame, and unwanted are NOT cast aside as a consequential absolute in 'AnCapistan') in polycentric law (there's a subredit for that and this user recommends Friedmn/Chrtier/Carsn/Ostrm/RobrtMrphy/M i s e s shop/search and some bitcoin.com articles and podcasts on the subject, Judge NAP is knowledgeable of polycentric law too) is a great way to go about things because it means competing and cooperating entities can hammer out problems more effectively than a singular entity with a monopoly over such over some 300 million or 7 billion people across a continent or a planet, as Chrles de Montesqu even attested to, anything outside the size of his beloved Geneva wouldn't take kindly to central planning. There's just too many people and the land covered and claimed is too large in a world of scarcity and getting into pissing contests is BULSHYT and only causes recessions. But of course, everything is brown peoples' fault...or whitey...or -blam!-...or (((THEM))), etc., etc.. Always looking to be saved or to save someone and blame someone....never one's own self being sufficient and accountable. That's what the damn world needs, accountability and self-sufficiency before the coming collapses. Get into prepping. Learn skills. Pass them on. Be less superficial, unless one can afford such responsibly, Vices are NOT crimes, as Spoonr discovered, but making them so is moral relativism. That forced association and forced disassociation/forced homogeneity and forced diversity only harbors ill-will and contempt and future conflict. STOP being helicopter parents going to source. It's called a parental control blocker, most TVs have them built in, okay prudes and progressives alike??? Let yr kids dive into the deep end of the pool, and if they're NOT yr kids...they're NOT YR KIDS!!! People should be able to get what they want or need at a price and at a risk they are comfortable with alone or with representation of their own. There is NO SUCH THING AS A NATURAL MONOPOLY. PERIOD. ALL are artificial. For example: A Corporation is a company with privileges granted by the government over others to bail them out and retain their monopolies for helping out the government and giving them status with their fake money they utilize and want people to believe in (all money is imaginary and individual ambition serves the common good -AdmSmith). The 'greater good' is a fallacy. Hitlr: BUT MUH GREATER GOOD! Zedingdong: BUT MUH GREATER GOOD! Staln: BUT MUH GREATER GOOD! Etc. TBCont'd.