{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/5/2018 3:41:54 AM
2
They said that "it would make sense" to sue. When it doesn't at all.
English
-
Actually he said “it would make since” so that should tell you all you need to know.
-
Anything after my question is irrelevant. Anything after my question is only my opinion and wants/wishes that are based on zero facts. Hope that clears anything up.
-
Not in that context i suppose, but in the United States DDoS attacks are considered cyber terrorism.
-
So that means you can sue Bungie? xD
-
No, but you can sue the person doing it.
-
Ok? But the OP is talking about Bungie being at fault. Not the DDoS(er). Like we have a case against Bungie because they're not doing enough. Still a completely dumb idea. Lots of armchair lawyers in here that talk a lot of smack but do nothing.
-
Don’t you at least understand their frustration though?
-
no that means you could charge the DDos'er IF there was damage done to your property
