JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
1/30/2018 3:11:37 AM
9

Trump administration declines to apply new Russia sanctions, for now

[quote]WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump administration said on Monday it would not immediately impose additional sanctions on Russia under a new law designed to punish Moscow’s alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election, insisting the measure was already hitting Russian companies. “Today, we have informed Congress that this legislation and its implementation are deterring Russian defense sales,” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said in a statement. “Since the enactment of the ... legislation, we estimate that foreign governments have abandoned planned or announced purchases of several billion dollars in Russian defense acquisitions.” The administration faced a deadline on Monday to impose sanctions on anyone determined to conduct significant business with Russian defense and intelligence sectors, already sanctioned for their alleged role in the election. But citing long time frames associated with major defense deals, Nauert said it was too soon to tell how effective the law had been, so it was better to wait to impose those sanctions. “From that perspective, if the law is working, sanctions on specific entities or individuals will not need to be imposed because the legislation is, in fact, serving as a deterrent,” she said in a statement. President Donald Trump’s administration also did not make public reports required by Monday under the bill he reluctantly signed into law on Aug. 2, just six months into his presidency. The measure, known as the “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act,” or CAATSA, required the administration to list “oligarchs” close to President Vladimir Putin’s government and issue a report detailing possible consequences of penalizing Russia’s sovereign debt. [/quote] So this legislation was written by congress, passed by both houses nearly unanimously [419-3 in the House, 98-2 in the Senate], and signed by the President - the President is refusing to enforce it? If the President isn't going to do his job, he needs to go. Dereliction of Duty is an impeachable offense.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by AnAverageGamer: 1/30/2018 3:54:59 AM
    I’m surprised I’m the first comment on this... Either way, this really pisses me off. I try to stay fairly independent toward things, but Russia attacked our electoral process and our two congressional bodies both voted almost unilaterally to punish them for it. Now Trump, a man who is openly trying to undermine an investigation into his potential links [i]to Russia[/i] is refusing to punish the very country he claims to have no ties to [i]despite a bipartisan vote for him to do so![/i] It’s absurd. I get why people who hate liberals love Trump, and I get how pathetic people who love bullies love him, but I don’t get how any rational person who loves America could love somebody who is so blatantly elevating another country above his own. Trump is shitting all over the image of what a republican is to so many independent voters who may lean right and causing irreparable damage to that party’s image. It’s a shame to see republicans all so complacent with that just because they can make some money off the same wealthy donators who Trump campaigned that he’d be against. I can’t wait for politics to be boring again.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    8 Replies
    • Can't do this, it would be like writing up your boss for being late.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • Go ahead and impeach him. Nothing will change lmao.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • [i]More[/i] sanctions, for shitposting Democrats on facebook....got it.... Shouldnt you be scolding Democrats for their idiotic leaked emails and awful candidate choice that cost you the election?

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      6 Replies
      • I’m not quite sure what the problem is here. Sanctions on Russia would make international tensions go up, and that is bad. Especially with a country like Russia. If the sanctions are in response to the ‘alleged’ interference in the 2016 elections, then they shouldn’t be passed. While there is evidence linking Russia to hacking the DNC, I have yet to see any evidence that this attack was federally mandated.

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        2 Replies
        • 2
          What if the Oompah-Loompah in Chief is acting on intelligence that we don't know about? I mean, the rest of the world hates us and is sick of us being the world police, so what if he is backing off for that reason? I don't know anything about it, I am just thinking out loud. It would be nice to believe that the people who run this country are actually doing what they are supposed too.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

          2 Replies
          • Yes because we totally want Cold War 2.0.

            Posting in language:

             

            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            5 Replies
            • But he did...it’s a list of rich Russians. Lol!

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              1 Reply
              • For Senate, who is the other one who didn't vote? I know that McCain can't participate in the voting process because he's currently undergoing treatment for cancer. Who are also the 3 in House? Also, I know there are going to be a lot of people in this forum against this because something about a liberal conspiracy made by the McDonald's fast food chains or something. But, this is agreed on by both parties, so why is it a bad thing? Or, is anything supported by a Democrat considered bad on this forum?

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                7 Replies
                You are not allowed to view this content.
                ;
                preload icon
                preload icon
                preload icon