-
No Patrick, synths are not people
-
Yes. [spoiler]Nick Valentine forever.[/spoiler]
-
No, they’re fictional. They don’t actually exist. Yet.
-
Yes and no. Yes, they are people and no, they aren't human.
-
Edited by Yarbey: 1/18/2018 9:18:24 AM[b] [/b]
-
The brotherhood of steel had the right idea by purging the railroad and the institute.
-
Yes. That said, the Railroad were incompetent fools. Reforming the Institute is the only right way.
-
What makes someone human is the question. I just watcj Devilman Crybaby and damn did that make me hate humanity. Because at the end of the day our most basic instincts are just us beimg savages to one another.
-
I say people, yes. They're not human, obviously, but the way they're portrayed makes me think of the Star Trek: The Next Generation episode "The Measure of a Man," where Data is put on trial, essentially to prove his "personhood." I think the outcome for a Fallout synth would go the same way.
-
This conversation reminds me a bit of SOMA. Let’s consider what the two primary characters of this game are, Simon and Catherine: [spoiler]-[u]Simon:[/u] a copy of the first man to have his brain fully scanned and mapped out, existing as a robot made from one of the corpses. -[u]Catherine:[/u] a copy of a woman working in the underwater station who founded the ARK project: which would take a copy of every member of staff’s brains and make a world for them to inhabit. She mostly inhabits an omnitool Simon carries[/spoiler] Neither Simon or Catherine consider themselves human as the game goes on. That being said, they still crack jokes, they still wonder about their existence, and they still try to survive. While watching a steam of SOMA meant to give an introspective read on the game, a member of the chat added this to the discussion of an ethical quandary: [spoiler]Due to an incident that nearly killed them, a large portion of their spine was surgically replaced, to the point where the chat member no longer considers themselves a human, but a cyborg. This began a discussion on the importance of valuing people as a concept that’s more than just humans.[/spoiler] The latest models of synths are built as both genetically grown and technologically built. Going as far back and Jack Valentine, synths have shown that they have thoughts and feelings. Some synth unaware of their own status even have dilemmas about the truth of their existence. The person in the twitch chat discussed the value of people as more than just humans. Simon and Catherine would be difficult to call human and to me they are people. Synths are much closer to humans in design and/or resemblance and they are people too.
-
Reploids > synths
-
Only a Synth would say this.
-
Um. no.
-
I'm going to channel my inner Hitl- I mean Maxson and say no
-
Aren’t they just robotic copies
-
No, they are synths. We can debate on whether they are "alive" or merely think they are but they are built so not people.
-
Are synths people? No. It's the only correct answer, and it's completely separate from the question of should Synths have rights.
-
I went with the Railroad. Technically not human.. but still. They could be very useful for humanity if you think about it.
-
Serious answer? If something has emotions and the capacity to think, it deserves to have a chance at life. No matter where it came from. Joke answer? Dirty Synths
-
I think so. Aliens, robots, eldritch horrors.. Anything that could be considered self conscious should be considered a person, and should be treated with the same treatment you’d give a human being.
-
Only the hot chick synths
-
Damn synths. Kill em all!
-
No they are not people, they are synthetics. Are they Alive? By some definitions yes.
-
Yes. Origin doesn't matter, only that the being is able to feel and think on the same level as us. Thinking otherwise is the same as slave owners believing it was okay because Africans were less than.
-
More human that some people.
-
Pretty much the whole plot of blade runner. Still have no clue.