Early on when this was all announced (concerning the "conference") after the con this past summer, which was a couple of YTers' idea for a "garbage con" in honor of and in co-opting of the term used, the unwarranted verbal attack on a prominent, chill YTer by a prominent leftist female "feminazee" and a great, smart person paid a visit to some lesser known female "skeptic" (a group of commentators/commenters, or sub-group, depending how deep one wants to make it all, on YT that do videos on events and people in the news or not in the news, by which this user means "fake news" in the "lamestream" (mainstream) who, apparently (this user has limited knowledge on some of the lesser known ones and even some larger ones in other fields on YT, and a vast amount of knowledge on some small and large YTers in fields this user follows; this user follows many, but not all, and listens to interviews in an effort to expand this user's mind and others on subjects and stuff) had a hubby but then didn't and then, allegedly, got engaged again, and this user doesn't know if that's still on or not, but the point is, this female seems like a single-parent, for whatever reason or reasons of anyone's fault or non one's, keep that in mind. At the house of the female the great intelligent gentleman helped further expand on the idea the group of other "skeptics" had while eating and complaining about how the con they were at was very one-sided (geared towards radical postmodern leftist children with little-to-no reprimand on those who worked to and verbally abused peaceful skeptics who attended that eventually broke off to have their own parties in their rooms because of this) to create their own con early next year which became largely financed and managed by this female YTer and a couple of people associated with the YTer. Sooafter, these past few days and weeks, with no credit being given or payment to at least one prominent YTer who came up with the idea and was flying in (and still is to meet fans but not speak at the panels) to the point the aforementioned great gentleman backed out due to personal reasons and an increasingly muddy-situation regarding contracts over NDAs and Non-competes for some speakers and some attendees and payment for some, but not others, not being sufficiently elaborated on in a recent livestream with those involved and surrounding the event. Early into the controversy, this user didn't think much of the NDA or lack thereof an ability to film the audience members/attendees not speaking (and/or speakers themselves) because this user is a proponent of privacy, even outside one's front door, and virtually everything being voluntary, as there are legit concerns over ex-members of certain groups and people, even children, not involved in anything wanting to stay as anonymous as possible whilst still attending and having a ood time and speaking and learning about good stuff with other people who may have differing opinions (if this user was going this user would go in a gimmick with a mask just in case anyone were to film attendees in the audience and not just speakers, as these were "dropped" at least for most and it being mandatory soon-after word got out and several prominent independent journalists some claim to be "alt-right", whether they are or not and the definition of that term being a different story, dropped out), but then this user read and listened more into the terms of the non-competes and how they were for three years for that city, as if they were doing more (most thought this would be a one-off, at least at first, but they planned three from the git-go, very interesting) and disagreed with that and a lot of people know these types of contracts are all fun and games until someone breaks something and then it's downhill from there. After being confronted over contractual disputes and payments (attendees are saying they have to buy tickets even after shelling out some three-hundred fiat petrodollars that somehow didn't cover a ticket) in a livestream, and giving weird video monologues warning and even possibly threatening words towards the "alt-right" speakers who pulled out as if they were going to cause a ruckus and get in trouble and try to take down the event somehow, physically with violence or with another nearby con (one speaker has an upcoming campus speaking tour btw, and this user doesn't even agree with everything that person says and believes but would like to hear from that person and even get into a dialectic, not even having it become a debate, just a conversation on a panel or such a platform sometime, but that's shady to try and bar them from speaking there for years). One event organizer in this stream has weird, empty eyes and dark/perverse-looking dolls on a couch and the other of a highly scrutinized ethnicity and three of the top players are women too, at least one, the female taking charge of it all who took the idea with the great gentleman who backed out, being on a voip server people chat and share ideas and articles on stuff about that was recently doxxed, likely by or for a prominent, leftist, and VERY FAKE NEWSpaper associated with the new/old world order and one "skeptic" (and self-proclaimed "wahrhahwk" likely living in a seeeyeaye spy facility in Europe) who doesn't believe race exists (social-construct folk...cringe) invited a reporter for the paper into the server who never said anything but recorded a lot for a (likely) hit piece in the name of "research", on "skeptics", "alt-right", "alt-lite", libertarians/AnCaps, "infowahrriors", independent journalists, etc., either out of incompetence or malice for losing arguments to actual scientists, biologists, psychologists, sociologists, etc., who rightly claim that race IS real and blax, whytbois, weemeen, doodz, etc., all are DIFFERENT and have RESPECTABLE DIFFERENCES, is likely FINISHED and "blackballed" from the YT platform/skeptic "community"/genre, etc.. This user, after listening, and continuing listening, to multiple multi-hour, multi-user livestream hangouts and interviews (this user consumes a vast amount of YT on a, usually, daily basis) while doing strikes and stuff and surfing the 'net tinkering with fantasy lineups and reading other news, whatever, is concerned with a conspiracy theory (something this user is usually into researching) that at least one of the organizers is involved with the doxxing and is either trying to compromise the personal information of several/as many non-radical-leftist tentacles/minions of the new/old world order for future hit pieces in writing or physical violence, or is scamming people for money, either alimony or to raise children (a single-parent does everything for their offspring, don't underestimate that) or is under the scope of the doxxers and are pawns in their plans, or, as this user has heard and read, that one should not expect, immediately, malice where there is merely incompetence, and the organizer(s) merely got garbage legal advice from people who are not part of the "community"/genre(s) and are between a "rock-and-a-hard-place" and don't want to own up to it, given by their responses or lack thereof. What are readers of this thread's contents' opinions on the matters of the event and server situation? Questions, comments? Thanks for reading. P.S. Why the lead female took so hard to putting up a defense against the "alt-right" in a video is striking, as a group that is commonly linked with skeptics is not likely to incite violence if there is any, it's almost always radical/paid leftist agitprop-filled minions as the perpetrators, which leads this user to think this may be the groundwork for a false-flag attack to blame anyone that could be associated with having a favorable opinion of, or policy shared by, the current president of this country. If there's a terror attack in PhnxAri next spring, ppl, yuh heard it predicted here first. IT'S A (POSSIBLE) TARP (yes this user knows that trap is misspelled as tarp, it's a meme)! Because there's a wahr on for yr mind! PeaceLuvandAnrchy! -AnCap Infowahrrior