{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/4/2017 2:32:26 PM
1
I certainly did. Peter Dinklage's ghost was horrible. He may have had a more layered voice than Nolan North's does, but his performance was constantly bored and uninterested. Yes, his direction probably wasn't stellar, but it's very clear that the only thing about the performance he cared about was the paycheck.
English
-
Have you heard nolan north? He should work for the Disney Channel instead with how cringe he is Your prolly a child
-
I'm not saying that Norths performance doesn't sound like a grown man attempting his best impression on a small child. [spoiler]It does[/spoiler] But that doesn't change the fact that his performance is far and away more animated and full of life than Dinklages. I'm not even sure that Peter has even had any voice acting gigs before this one.
