{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/28/2017 7:43:04 PM
10
Difference between games and exclusives
So every time I read anything about Microsoft or the new XboX, I always see the same comment. And it's always shoved out there with the confidence that it trumps every other possible argument that might be in favor of XboX.
"Xbox has no games."
Now why has this been the go-to argument against Xbox recently? Does no one realize that there is a difference between games and [i]exclusives[/i]?
Sure, PS has a few good exclusives (I say a few because while there are some fantastic ones, a lot of them are pretty disappointing), but Xbox has all of the same non-exclusives that PS does, and now those games are going to get a nice graphics boost on the new console.
The Xbox library is still huge, and last time I checked, tons of devs were already announcing the updates their games are going to get.
All this is to simply say: Hey, think about what you're saying before you post.
-
Xbox exclusive franchises that i can think of right now: Gears of war Halo Forza Banjo Killer instinct Sea of thieves Recore Fable Quantum something They have a game for everyone and these games generally dominate in their categories. I'd take Gears over Uncharted because i get much more replay out of the games. Halo is easily better than Killzone or Resistance Forza has been touted as the best racing franchise for a few years now. Killer instinct is a solid fighter Banjo is dead as hell Sea of thieves looks very promising Recore apparently was a solid game that I'd like to see more of. Fable 1-2 are great adventure rpgs (3 is undoubtedly shit) Quantum break is for you story nerds. Ms has exclusives, they just don't use them enough. They also own Rare and are just starting to have them do shit for once with Sea of thieves.
