It honestly amazes me that this is still up for debate. This is the hypothesis given by the propagandists: http://bazantmisconduct.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Bazant_Crush_up-1-300x156.png Now anyone who actually understood what they learned in [b][u]high school physics[/u][/b] will know that this is physically impossible. The picture basically states that the fire caused the towers to "split" into two separate, let's call them "blocks." It states that the supports failed underneath top block, causing it to fall onto the bottom block. Now this twenty or so storey block crushed the 90 or so stories underneath it. The top block then got crushed by the ground when it impacted it. This is the story the government has handed us, basically insulting us as if we are cattle unable of critical thinking. And the sad part is that many people accepted it, even a so called physics professor or whatever on this website. [b]Newton's 3rd Law of Motion:[/b][quote]For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. [/quote] At least they acknowledge this law, but at the very end, when apparently the top block acted like a pile driver all the way until it hit the ground, where the ground provided the opposite reaction. The thing is, it wouldn't work like that. The top block would simultaneously be getting crushed with the bottom block as well. This would happen until the top block is crushed into complete disintegration, until there is nothing left of it to act as a pile driver onto the lower. Since the top block was only 20 or so stories, it would only have the energy to destroy an equal amount of floors of the bottom block. And, since structures are built stronger at the base and get built weaker as you go up, it probably wouldn't even destroy an equal number of floors but actually less. But I digress. [b]Conservation of Momentum[/b][quote]the momentum of a system is constant if there are no external forces acting on the system.[/quote] This is another fundamental law that the three towers defied. What we can observe is that the top and bottom block actually acted as one structure and fell at a uniform acceleration. So what you have is this: m1v1 + m2v2 = v3(m1 + m2) [spoiler]I don't know how to subscript on here lol[/spoiler] Where m1 = mass of the top block v1 = velocity of the top block m2 = mass of the bottom block v2 = velocity of the bottom block v3 = the new velocity of the two merged blocks falling together So if you're still following from here you can see many things wrong with the scenario. For people who aren't following, to make it simpler for you, v2 = 0. This is the velocity of the bottom block, which was at rest. Meaning all the momentum has to have come from the top block falling. Now on the right side of the equation, you have the two masses added together, then multiplied by a new velocity, and this value has to be equal to the momentum from the top block only. In simpler words, the top block [b]had to have decelerated[/b] in order to exert a force onto the lower block. But this is not the case. From any video you cannot measure any value of deceleration. The acceleration is all uniform. Think of yourself driving a nail into a piece of wood with a hammer. When the hammer hits the nail, the hammer decelerates, and this is when the force is transferred to the nail. The common misconception people have is that the top block exerts a greater force than normal because it's falling. But this is untrue as the entire tower is collapsing as one. Think of dropping an anvil on your foot, as opposed to calmly setting the anvil onto your foot. It would hurt a lot more than setting it on. And that's because there would be a strong force, due to the anvil decelerating as it hits you. But this is [b]not[/b] the case of the towers. [b]They did not decelerate.[/b] So comparing them to the anvil is wrong. It would be more accurate to think of holding your entire arm out perpendicular to your body and opening your palm towards the sky. Now, somebody drops an anvil on your hand. Your hand won't stay still, your hand and entire arm will accelerate with the anvil, until it swings towards your body and out of the way of the falling anvil. And it would probably barely hurt if at all. And that's because the anvil will barely decelerate when it hits your hand, thus transferring barely any force onto your hand. Here's a neat little experiment demonstrating this law: https://youtu.be/9YRUso7Nf3s I know it sucks to hear that the government would do such a thing just to begin a "war on terror" which is just an oil grab to further the NWO agenda, but it's true. The people are considered expendable to the government. They are not to be trusted.[quote]In these countries, in the so called Democracies, it's people are by no means the main focus of attention. What really matters, is exclusively the existence of these "Democracy makers." That is, the existence of a few hundred giant capitalists who own all the factories and shares, and who ultimately, lead the people. They do not care about the great mass of people at all. They are the only ones who can be addressed as international elements because they conduct their business everywhere. [b]It is a small, rootless, international clique, that is turning the people against eachother, that does not want them to have peace...[/b][/quote]