{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/18/2017 6:03:06 PM
17
Bungie: we want you to be more social,play together with new and old friends in as many ways as possible.
....cuts crucible to 4 player fireteams
I have a core group of 6 people who were all very excited for this now we find out its 3 and 3 or 4 and 2...really bungie....really
English
-
Just because that's all they're showing now, doesn't mean that's all that will be in the final game. Last year Respawn only showed the new game modes in their beta, that they were going to add to the game. Everyone lost their minds thinking that Attrition---the most popular play mode----wasn't going to be in the game. Eveyrone was "disappointed" Insisting that the release of the game needed to be delayed because Respawn had done such a horrible job...... ...and Attrition was right there in the game to be played on Launch Day.
-
Bruh they literally said 4v4 only across the board. -blam!- outta here lol
-
Must have been said in the part that I missed.
-
Yeah it's a step backwards from bungie.
-
Disagree. 1. Most people who have played the Crucible in well-staged 4v4 private matches have spoken highly of it. 2. Bungie clearly didn't like the speed of play and the "chaotic" nature of 6v6 play. In fact in an interview both Weisznewski and Merrill expressed their open dislike of it, and preference for 3v3. IMO, many of the really unpopular changes to the Sandbox were due to that dislike for the speed and "chaos" of 6v6, and trying to tune it out of the game by nerfing everything into the ground. If 4v4 is a workable compromise position that will give Bungie the team-based play the want...but without nerfing the armory into the ground or restricting play styles....then I consider that a step forwards....not backwards. It will also simplfy management of the sandbox, and hopefully increase the odds of them getting it right.
-
Why not just add 4v4 on top of 6v6 then? Lol
-
Because the people within Bungie who control the Sandbox don't like it either. I like 6v6. Its pretty much all I play in the Crucible. But if giving up 6v6 means all the OTHER crap that's been done trying to slow down 6v6 goes away as well....that's a trade I'm willing to make.
-
I imagine the change is for the more competitive players (me included as the more people in a match the less predictable it is and more chaotic it is). They really should've just kept to the standard 6v6 for those who prefer that and just made a simple competitive TDM 4v4 style for those who wanted it. Best to try and let them know NOW so that it can be there by launch.
-
Thats actually a great idea
-
Hopefully, it goes back to 6v6 and maybe they'd let us do 6 squad patrols too Cause I have more than two best friends I've got like four of them betches
-
Yup i agree like bungie cmon if it isnt broken dont try to fix it
-
Improve upon it and add onto it imo
-
Yep, I'm pretty upset about that, actually. Who the hell was complaining about 6v6? They continue to mess with things that worked.
-
Lots of people actually. Many of the former Halo players would always refer to 6v6 as "chaotic". But it never bothered me as a Titanfall player. Since Titanfall lobbiers were always 8v8...plus all the PVE elements if you were playing a mode like Attritition.
-
But the majority though? I mean it kind of sucks that a few pros whine about it, then we get stuck with game modes we don't care for.
-
Better a game mode than an entire sandbox.
-
Yup typical bungie i found it funny when they said bungie heard the players and listened to them because if they had actually done that they wouldve announced important things not flashy cinematics like michael bay does with his films
