Which series, when played at the maximum difficulty & Solo, is the most difficult?
[spoiler]
In Gears, you can get one shot by ALOT of things NORMALLY. But you can always get revived by teammates. Not on Insane. If you go down, you die. Also, enemies have a ton of health and do a ton of damage.[/spoiler]
[spoiler]In Halo, you have shields. Which on max difficulty....are like an egg shell to a hammer. However, because the first few games (including Reach and ODST) are harder then the later games, [i]WE ARE NOT INCLUDING HALO 4/5.[/i]
With that out of the way, you actually stand more of a chance at close quarters then in Gears. Your melee is much stronger then the one in Gears, and you can save yourself much more with it. Not to mention enemies have mountains of hp and their dps is often enough to just one shot you. [looking at you, H2 jackal snipers][/spoiler]
My Personal Experience:
[spoiler][b]When I was younger, at least 2-3 years,[/b] I played through and beat all of the Halo games on Legendary in chronological order. It was a blast, but hell. Halo 1 and 2 took [u]weeks[/u] for me to beat. 3, however, didn't take long at all. I grew up playing it, and it was more or less muscle memory.
I'm currently in the beginning of Gears 4, and let me tell you it is already MUCH HARDER then any of the OTHER GAMES. 1,2,3, and Judgment had their more then fair share of bullshit, but so far, 4 is -blam!-ing insane. I'm getting flashbacks to Halo CE. [/spoiler]
-
Everyone who says Halo is harder - your opinion isn't valid if you haven't played GoW 4.
-
One thing. Cortana on LASO. You want to -blam!-ing kill yourself at the end (or beginning)
-
I have Cyclops PTSD.
-
Halo came naturally gears of war didn't
-
H2 alone is harder than all of the Gears' difficulties combined. Don't get me wrong, both franchises I love a lot. Halo, however and difficulty-wise, takes the cake without a doubt.
-
Dude... [spoiler]jackal[/spoiler] [spoiler]snipers[/spoiler] [spoiler]halo wins[/spoiler]
-
Halo by far. I never had much dificulty with Gears on insane, sure it was challenging but still doable in a normal way. Halo (specialy Halo 2) was hard as nails on legendary, people already mentioned Jackal snipers that could oneshot you (actualy they could oneshot you on heroic I recall), but elites had a lower TTK than you, in particulair the jetpack Elites in H2, making them tricky to kill.
-
Halo has a lot more moving pieces and no auto-cover system to exploit.
-
Hm... i think it's a toss up for me
-
Edited by Oblixious: 1/26/2024 4:35:43 PM
-
Do we count LASO or just legendary?
-
Edited by Mongoose: 2/17/2017 8:02:32 PMIf you're comparing them at their most difficult, Halo skulls would be involved. I don't have enough experience with the Gears of Wars franchise to draw a conclusion, but it seems like you didn't account for that significant component of Halo difficulty.
-
Edited by Tartan 118: 2/17/2017 6:48:51 PMHow many people chose 'Halo, by a lot' thinking the question was 'Which is better?'?
-
Halo because in Gears you actually have a lot of cover to use. I like Gears as a franchise more though.
-
If your not including Halo 4, then why include Gears 4?
-
Halo was harder legendary. Thats for SURE