{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/15/2017 9:14:13 AM
8
New Monarchy aligns with me. How could we expand to other stars when the fight here at home is not concluded? Why focus on building weapons when we could focus on bringing people together under a new world order? An order of peace and prosperity for humans?
English
-
Quite radical leftist^
-
I don't even know what I am. I will say in real life that's not what I want but I'm not gonna get into politics. 😂
-
:))) ok man, i was just being a punk. You re cool
-
The main issue I have with New Monarchy is the whole "one impeachable ruler" aspect.
-
Edited by KazunK3k: 1/17/2017 12:48:28 PMTrue, that is one thing I've disagreed with. Having a leader that would lead for a set amount of time, no more than that, with a variety of council chambers and senate committees to make decisions (basically similar to the U.S. government) would be better, and more trustworthy to not be corrupt.
-
Maybe, although that leads to the possibility of things not getting done as well. In my opinion a single ruler would be good, but they need to be voted there and also obey a set standard of rules. If they break these rules they have a chance to argue their reason why in front of a select group of highly respected community members. And any abuse of force will be met with the guardians taking them out of power.
-
That actually could be good too. I like it.
-
New Monarchy!!!
