{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/2/2016 4:06:30 PM
1
Actually Bethesda is the publisher of ESO - not the developer.
I can only imagine why someone would have voted for Bethesda is FO4.
IMHO - FO4 was not the best outing in the series, but then again this coming from someone that thought FO3 was a huge slap to longtime FO fans.
As for Skyrim SE (SSE) - well depends which version of the original you sing as the comparison.
If you're using the console version - then SSE is vastly superior over the original.
If you're using the PC version - then it's very debatable as to which is better.
English
-
SSE is better in all platforms because it allows for better and more detailed mods than the OG skyrim
-
True.. I'm just saying that it is debatable depending on who and where you are asking. Believe or not - there are those who believe the SSE - in it's current state - is not as good as the original game. I for one am waiting for several of the tools to be updated / ported to SSE before I start playing on a more serious basis. This includes on waiting for Boris to get ENB back to the same level as we had with the OG and not the version that is used for FO4. (if that is possible) I'm waiting for the update to SKSE which in turns means I'm waiting for a version of SkyUI for SSE. (Forgot how much I hated the base UI in the game) xEdit / Wrye Bash / LOOT and their support of SSE are still work in progress and not quite as stable as their OG counterparts. The Mod community has been doing a great job in porting / updating, but it's going to take time to get to a level of modding that the OG has enjoyed.
-
Bethesda knows that they can't do everything for the community so the let the community do it themselves
