{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/24/2016 11:08:18 PM
43
Please Explain How War With Russia Under Hillary
Would be worse than handing control of your government to a Trump? I'm waiting!!
-
Well... 30,000 nukes 200 of them are not owned but the US and Russia so yeah I don't want a war with Putin
-
Guaranteed war versus possible war? Gee, hard to decide.
-
1 ReplyYou are talking to a bunch of Midwest Hillbillies in here. You're not going to get logical answers
-
4 RepliesEdited by Syndicate Bias: 10/27/2016 1:22:49 AMThey're american? American people are idiots and would vote for Hillary as everyone in Britain And Australia(you) And the EU Would know that Americans can be fed any kind of bullshot and buy it. Apparently presidents can launch nukes at any time without congress lmfao. There's one lie. Point is Hillary supporters are terribly misinformed and misguided. Hillary could care less about a war with Russia. As far as everyone who is informed she's a liar to the very core not saying Trump is a good man or he's amazing or the saviour but he's at least less of an actual threat than hillary. Oh and hillary don't give a shot about how many american men die in a war. Since she's a woman and that's something that apparently she should get votes for. Aside from the fact that she doesn't give a damn about her own people anyways so bye bye to them lol. Not saying Engalnd rn is doing the very best but its getting better ish o_o Now those who are neutral or whatever don't be triggered lol meant for the misinformed Americans even though I poorly texted this as all Americans are idiots
-
Edited by pl0785: 10/27/2016 5:26:58 AMI think a war with Russia is incredibly unlikely. Incredibly unlikely. Who starts the war and what's the cause? Russia doesn't want to directly confront America. Their military and economy is a joke compared to the US. So, I assume America starts this hypothetical war. With a nuclear power. While war weariness is endemic. I just dont see it happening...
-
8 Replieswhen people are threatened by Russia to vote trump and do so. those are traitors. you're letting an enemy country control your vote out of fear you are not American if you do this
-
Dis bait is funny bait
-
3 RepliesSignificant possibility of nuclear holocaust. Though assuming I survive the blast and immediate fallout, I'm going to rule the wastes like the lone wanderer and kill me a deathclaw.
-
18 RepliesAre you gonna respond or are you to afraid to admit you're wrong?
-
3 RepliesJudging by Trump he'd just give America to Putin if Putin buttered him up. So I pick your poison I reckon.
-
I'm voting trump simply because I can't stand Hillary( her "it's everyone else's fault attitude", all the scandals, and her voice) Trump on the other hand couldn't care if he's mean or politically correct. Not to mention the fact that killary wants to take a giant dump on our second amendment( as an avid hunter and otherwise weapon enthusiast I am strongly against.) Also I want someone with a much stronger foreign policy, especially when it comes to ISIS and terrorism, we actually negotiate and treat terrorists humanely instead of the animals they are. [spoiler]TLDR we need someone who will make America great again.[/spoiler]
-
38 RepliesI don't know what's worse Everyone believing we'll have war with Russia if one of these candidates is elected Or Nobody realizing Congress decides if we go to war
-
30 RepliesI'm confused by this whole thing. I was under the impression that one thing Trump supporters complained about in regards to Hillary was that she would make our country look weak to other nations. Or, at least, that Trump would make us look strong and wouldn't back down. Doesn't voting for a certain candidate because we are afraid Russia will declare war seem like just that kind of weakness?
-
3 Replies[quote]Would be worse than handing control of your government to a Trump? I'm waiting!![/quote] ....please explain how a potential conflict with Russia under Hillary is BETTER than a trump presidency. WAIT (grabs popcorn...wait I hate popcorn. Grabs chips) Ok go.
-
4 RepliesRussia would probably use nuclear weapons against us, knowing thats the only way they could win.
-
4 RepliesTrump is very anti war. Killary wants Americans to die for no reason.
-
Gorbachev just said that we are closer to war right now than we ever were during the Cold War. Now I don't know if you have any nuclear missile proof bunkers close but if Clinton is elected, I feel we won't have to wait much longer for the new fallout.
-
2 RepliesThe US, under the directive of Obama and Hillary Clinton, has placed a missile "defense" system in Romania to prevent attacks from "terrorists". Let me tell you that last time Russia even TRIED to pull that shit with us we had the Cuban Missile Crisis.
-
Edited by icothiba: 10/26/2016 1:48:13 PMWhoa, Jax, this isn't your normal posting. Are you sick? [spoiler]Or bait?[/spoiler]
-
For the sake of the argument; Hillary wants to create a no-fly zone in Syria which is an act of war against the Russian forces that occupy the area. The head of the U.S. Army flat out said that it would be an act of war. Trump has said he would rather befriend Russia and mend things with Putin in an effort to smother ISIS. Or, at the very least, gtfo of the way and let Putin do what Obama should have done years ago.
-
Nuclear bombs?
-
10 RepliesWar with a nuclear armed nation is way worse than a war with Iran, which in 2008 Hillary wanted to annihilate. And Hillary has destroyed 2 Muslim country's and created millions of refugees, with those being Libya(which is all her fault) and Iraq, and she is pushing for Syria too.
-
Edited by Lt Dan: 10/26/2016 3:02:36 PMBecause war with Russia could mean the end of the world
-
Because a war with Russia ends the world and just because trump is elected doesn't mean the world will end
-
1 ReplyEdited by LahDsai: 10/26/2016 6:09:30 AMEither way, we're screwed. The question is, do we die alone or take everyone else down with us (let's face it, an open US/Russian war would be WWIII)?
-
Yep so much logic and reason on here: - Current Command does not initiate hostile military actions but pushes embargoes on a rogue nation that thinks it can do whatever because of its military might - instant chorus hurr durr so weak. - Anything positive done by current Commnad : nope it was actual people serving that did it, not direction of leadership. - Anything negative attributed to current command: current command is personally responsible. And finally, a stance from someone that goes like 'If you fvck with us trying illegal shit because you think can away with it, we'll bang you up pretty hard' - Aww hell so dangerous, better to choose 'safe' deal making and readily give in. (Same folks have no qualms making jokes about the 'French' giving up and what not )
