I say this because there are just some people who shouldn't be driving. Then if they took a test where they would have to take a driving test then if they failed the test, they would have there driving license suspended until they learn how to drive like a normal. What do you think about this? Do you agree or disagree?
-
Honestly though, all you -blam!-ing need is an arm and an eye to get a license. My kids going through drivers ed right now and it's 10 times easier than it used to be. Can we just emphasize when it's your turn at an intersection?
-
I disagree, but for broader reasons than others might have. We're talking about... 1) Public roads 2) State licenses 3) Coercion I oppose all of these things.
-
No one would have a license if that was the case. We all have picked up bad habits. However, I believe senior citizens should be required to pass some sort of reevaluation every couple years or so
-
Every 5-10 years. I wouldn't care if i had to take one.
-
Senior citizens yes adults pre senior citizen no
-
No, but a more comprehensive program for testing initially would create better drivers and weed out those who just shouldn't be behind the wheel.
-
Not until they hit 70.
-
I've seen some people so some crazy things. It makes me question what kind of driving school they went to, or if they even went to one at all.
-
After a certain age, yes. I think after 60, you should have to re-take the test every maybe 7 years. After 85, every 2 years.
-
Actually, I feel like it should be done by random device observation. Because, let's be fair, when you KNOW someone's watching and grading you, you will of course be on your best.