{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Kone19ps:
9/9/2016 6:38:38 PM
30
Why was queens choice nerfed?
Is there a reason besides consistency with the rest? I thought non-hitscan were already at a disadvantage so why should they be the same?
Edit: queens choice is why I used sidearms and usually just that one. The others don't feel right to me. So this is really hitting home for me since this weapon is why I used the weapon type at all
-
Edited by ManBlaster: 9/10/2016 2:13:42 PMI am in the same sinking boat amigo, the hakke are hitscan and IMO unreliable for a hitscan weapon but to nerf the non-hitscan sidearm that actually could carry its own weight really can ONLY be justified by the fact that they want you to use the NEW sidarms they made and stop using the others the hakke buff was to keep up appearances they still don't hold a candle to the queens choice. Never have I heard a single dude say any sidearm was OP. I understand some guns earn their nerfs but the queen's choice? just give it back its little chunk of damage and leave the damn peashooters alone. absolutely absured. they want us to use something other than a shotty or a snipe then don't nerf the most underrated guns before they even show signs of being powerful or threaten your 'balance'. hell let them shine for awhile if just so you see that 'loadout stagnation' bungie mentioned dissipate for atleast a while. or to say it in Trumpian "Make Sidarms Great For Once"
