{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/2/2016 10:57:20 PM
1
I absolutely support phasing out last gen consoles. I too believe that older technology holds back the potential of new games and content. That doesnt mean that a game that is licensed to be sold as an old gen title should have dlc that invalidates its content. Once Destiny becomes current gen only, they could do whatever they want, but to do it under a current old gen license is theft. People thought theyd be playing destiny 1 on old gen til the new gen only destiny 2 dropped. As its always been done. There was no precedent to have dlc make a console obsolete. Defending this business ethic is whats made america crap in economics.
English
-
What? We were not even sure there would be sequels. I actually thought they would just give us DLC for 10 years. Bungie never marketed Destiny as a 10 year long old gen game.
-
Lmfao! You just argued yourself. Was i supposed to have input? K...?
-
Destiny was supposed to release instead of Rise of Iron, so old gen got phased out when planned. I'm not sure why you were "lmoa" bit I'm not arguing with myself. I see good business practice for Microsoft and Sony.
-
Lmfao!!! You just defended lazy failures.... Literally. They didnt keep their deadline for the games release and they used a dlc to invalidate entire consoles... Yeah man, great business practices. Customer loyalty and retention isnt important. Business ethics... Not a thing.
-
Business ethics? Business is about making money. Customer retention? Rise of Iron was the top selling add on in PS store when it was released. Destiny is still one of the most popular games out there, Bungie is doing fine.
