I might make a shit ton of these.
But I'm curious off topic, so hit me with your "logic"
discuss
now
-
Seriously, either way you can't taste. If you take away scent you can't taste anything
-
Why choose when I can already do both? [spoiler]wort[/spoiler]
-
you can hardly taste without smell
-
Link to my second poll! https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/210836624/0/0
-
Edited by Thaddeus Hamlet: 8/11/2016 2:26:13 PMI think it's something like 70% of taste [i]is[/i] scent, so technically you wouldn't be able to taste much if you couldn't smell. But in a hypothetical scents (badum-tss), taste over smell.
-
Edited by michaeljacksen: 8/11/2016 1:51:25 PMThis is a no-brainier really. So is, I would rather see then hear. I mean, sure I would miss music but I can't stumble all over the place. And you have to see to play Videogames.
-
I cant smell anyway.
-
Im Rick Harrison, and this is my pawn shop. I work here with my old man and son, Big Hoss. Everything in here has a story and a price. One thing I've learned after 21 years - you never know WHAT is gonna come through that door
-
The second one happens to me every summer [spoiler]I hate allergies[/spoiler]
-
Edited by MildSquirrel: 8/11/2016 10:02:25 AMNo smell would make stuff taste weird. No taste would suck but it has benefits
-
No taste, therefore I can eat nasty tasting healthy shit all the time and be shredded
-
It's honestly a painful trade off considering both the senses.
-
Bumping bump bump