1. If can only fire twice because the sun is used up after both shots.
2. It can't move, it's a goddamn planet, not a spaceship.
3. Too. Damn. Vulnerable.
4. I'm sure the cost of the thing was at least twice it costed to build the two Death Stars.
5. Death Star was better in every way...except for that damn ventilation...
-
Edited by CliffyWeevil29: 7/14/2016 4:19:51 AM[quote]1. If can only fire twice because the sun is used up after both shots. [/quote]That's not true, it absorbs all of the output of the sun, not the star itself. After some time, the sun would be usable again.[quote]2. It can't move, it's a goddamn planet, not a spaceship.[/quote]It can move, not well, but it can move.[quote]3. Too. Damn. Vulnerable.[/quote]It would've been practically invincible if they didn't get into the exhaust manifold. Security was its downfall.[quote]4. I'm sure the cost of the thing was at least twice it costed to build the two Death Stars.[/quote]I'm sure it was a lot more than that, although if it was built out of a planet, the planet would likely contain many usable materials.[quote]5. Death Star was better in every way...except for that damn ventilation...[/quote] Couldn't Starkiller base destroy multiple planets at once, and weren't it's shields nearly impenetrable? I'd say it was better than the Death Star.