{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:The Digital Dojo
7/7/2016 7:31:45 PM
1
[spoiler]The way he was taught was that there should only be one chain in a reply.[/spoiler]
English
-
Edited by Skatch142: 7/7/2016 9:39:00 PM[spoiler]But then it gets confusing... And you end up having a bunch of conversations between two people as opposed to having a single conversation between multiple people... He also seems to be ignoring me considering he still hasn't answered me but he has answered you a bunch of times...[/spoiler]
-
[spoiler]I know. Use that reply that mentions that this uses multiple timelines.[/spoiler]
-
[spoiler]Wouldn't I be replying to you? You said that...[/spoiler]
-
[spoiler]Reply to him[/spoiler]
-
[spoiler]I already did... I asked "What do you mean?" When he said I could use the same chain as you...[/spoiler]
-
[spoiler]Oh, he meant that you could jump in in a place that you want to. It is an interesting concept, pick up where the last dropped off...[/spoiler]
-
[spoiler]We dropped off at my reply so I'll just repost it considering technically it's still his turn.[/spoiler]
