Having an 0.4 is still terrible. If you only jumped that far in 6 months something is wrong. If you averaged a 1.3 you wouldn't be bitching about PVP. I notice that same trend. Everybody bitching about PVP rocks below an 0.5 KD. I'd be upset at PVP if I was that bad as well. Just get over it. PVP keeps the game going. We all love PVE but if that's all the game was it would have died out by now.
English
-
Edited by mungrel: 4/7/2016 1:14:20 AMOk man. Your missing the point. My shit skill in pvp isnt related to the fact its cheap to make. I actually enjoy pvp. To drag my y1 stats up to positive without dropping a character, i would have to play 2315 games with a kd of 2 or above. So your improvement statement is invalid. But good on you for being such a top bloke. Strawman my statements based on half reality about my stats. Like i said i like pvp. Im not ragging on it like you so defensively though. Its just cheap shit to program thats all. Let me know when you have played over 2000 consecutive games with a 2.0 kd. And we will have another conversation. All the best.
-
I'm just saying if you were good at PVP you probably wouldn't have a problem with it being preferred over PVE. Games don't live off of PVE anymore. We're in 2016.
-
And im saying i like pvp. Win or lose i like it. Its because im not precious. I also acknowledge that companies make more money from pvp because theres less to invest. If a game is sold as a hybrid then the weight of content should be split between all components of that game. You seem as thpugh you are stuck on me hating pvp because im not good at it. Com pletely untrue. I have enjoyed improving. Believe me its been frustrating to come last for a whole year, and to win and go positive in y2 is very satisfying. AGAIN my point is the game was sold with both elements (regardless of the cost of each) so they should keep both progressing equally. Pvp is cheap, pve is expensive. On a side note, trying to use stats to invalidate this statement is f ucking retarded.