[quote]7. [b]Sex education[/b]. Sex ed is already lacking, even for straight people. "Abstinence only" sex ed has been proven to be completely ineffective, and yet it is still widely taught across the country. But even more unfortunate is that sex ed in schools is entirely heteronormative. If you're gay or trans and need to learn about the birds and the bees, heterosexual sex ed isn't going to be very useful. In order for all people, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation, to be able to enjoy [i]safe[/i] sex, sex ed must account for everyone, not just straight people.[/quote] Woah, woah, woah! I don't care if you're gay, but learn yourself if it really means that much to you. Gay sex is [b]NOT[/b] how it's meant to be done on a natural level, so it would be redundant to add to the curriculum. It could affect you for the rest of your life. Gay sex carries no such implications and has a much lower risk of damage.