One year after I made the original thread, I feel it's time to once more incite the debate about proving your existence to me(and the rest of the Flood).
As in the previous thread, the "I think therefore I am" argument is invalid and presets no objective facts.
And go!
-
There are two situations: I am not an extension of you, I am an entity upon myself. Not being of you, I am able to create this post through my own processing of thought. I created something, so I exist. I am an extension of you. However, even if this post is of your own, it is an idea upon itself. Even if this post is of you, it is an individual thought, and therefore exists.