My point is that it's not redundant to recognize the difference between how others may label you (or see how you "are") and how you identify - a point that's generally appreciated when folks don't fall into our artificially narrow categories of human identity and may still be working through that.

[quote]My point is that it's not redundant to recognize the difference between how others may label you[/quote] >relevant [quote]I was not talking about classifications but the fact that the OP already stated she "is a female" My point was that you were being redundant- not that it's a crime to sub classify. What are you on? Once again you're suggesting that my logic of unisex restrooms and simply leaving it at humans are humans because genders don't offer any benefits to our lives thus be the gender that keeps you the least stressful- I mean that's what life is about: Lessening its stress, is the root issue and you want to have more lines of which will lead to more uncertainty, and as you said artificial norms- yet you think won't lead to the exact issues we have?[/quote] You're mad because I made an analogy with "broader classification" when in reality that's not just a "broader" classification but an aspect in general. To go further a male human is a class of humans- but also it's an aspect of humanity. Trust me, my logic is clearly more accepting than your treating it. I could care less about your identifying. Really don't know what you're trying to attack me for.