As long as you identify as female and follow our code of conduct, you're welcome!

[quote]As long as you identify as female and follow our code of conduct, you're welcome![/quote] Kek political correctness

Treating people with respect is definitely funny! http://neil-gaiman.tumblr.com/post/43087620460/i-was-reading-a-book-about-interjections-oddly

It was unnecessary, actually. Obviously you being a female and identifying as one are the same thing. It's like suggesting that as long as I identify as an animal then I am human. No shit. Also how dare you. Tumblr? Gonna go kms.

It's a response we use to reinforce our membership policies. It is used all throughout this recruitment.

So identifying as a broader classification automatically makes you a narrower sub-classification? Poor logic and a poor analogy to the issue of identity. Given our society's views on how sex and gender are defined and the narrow categories into which people are generally placed, distinguishing between how you might be identified by others and how you identify is valid. Re: Tumblr, I prefer to use the original source material whenever possible. Attempting to discredit the thought by attacking the medium through which it was presented only raises questions about your own sensitivity to critique.

You're not even making sense now. I never said that, I said that if you identify as a female then you are one? The only poor logic is your redundancy to make baseless assertions on things I never claimed to of said. Please work on your reading comprehension. Stay in school- Go to school. Whatever it may be, just learn how to read. It's really weird how you get these statements from me when I'm maintaining a very linear train of thought.

"It's like suggesting that as long as I identify as an animal [broader classification] then I am a human [narrower sub-classification]" Science is hard.

[quote]I am 11, can I still join it? I am female. As long as you identify as female and follow our code of conduct, you're welcome![/quote] Once again. You're failing to straw man, you've back tracked and now making assumptions to debunk a very obvious notion. You were being redundant. I thought that was funny. You then went of a feminazi rage suggesting that I was laughing at accepting "others". How hilarious. Read my comment again. [quote]It was unnecessary, actually. Obviously you being a female and identifying as one are the same thing. It's like suggesting that as long as I identify as an animal then I am human. No shit. Also how dare you. Tumblr? Gonna go kms.[/quote] I was not talking about classifications but the fact that the OP already stated she "is a female" and then you commented that. Redundant. Also suggesting that I need your help to get away from other genders is not tolerant, you do realize this correct? Your argument makes you out to be more disrespectful and insensitive than me- subjecting all to one gender roles "sore apples"; Meanwhile my logic is that I could care less what gender you are as stated earlier. Once again you're suggesting that my logic of unisex restrooms and simply leaving it at humans are humans because genders don't offer any benefits to our lives thus be the gender that keeps you the least stressful- I mean that's what life is about: Lessening its stress, is the root issue and you want to have more lines of which will lead to more uncertainty, and as you said artificial norms- yet you think won't lead to the exact issues we have?

First of all an animal is not a broader classification analogy to trans of humans. Humans are animals. It's literally a biological classification of matter. Subclassifications of animals are species and once again this is not related to genders- worse yet, that was my not point. My logic if anything suggested that humans are humans. Trans are trans. Genders are genders. No need to care over dividing lines. So really your point doesn't make sense. >science - And... honestly I have no idea how that means anything? I feel as if tumblr doesn't provide you with enough information when conversing. You're really not making sense... So, what's your point? [spoiler]My point was that you were being redundant- not that it's a crime to sub classify. What are you on?[/spoiler]

My point is that it's not redundant to recognize the difference between how others may label you (or see how you "are") and how you identify - a point that's generally appreciated when folks don't fall into our artificially narrow categories of human identity and may still be working through that.

[quote]My point is that it's not redundant to recognize the difference between how others may label you[/quote] >relevant [quote]I was not talking about classifications but the fact that the OP already stated she "is a female" My point was that you were being redundant- not that it's a crime to sub classify. What are you on? Once again you're suggesting that my logic of unisex restrooms and simply leaving it at humans are humans because genders don't offer any benefits to our lives thus be the gender that keeps you the least stressful- I mean that's what life is about: Lessening its stress, is the root issue and you want to have more lines of which will lead to more uncertainty, and as you said artificial norms- yet you think won't lead to the exact issues we have?[/quote] You're mad because I made an analogy with "broader classification" when in reality that's not just a "broader" classification but an aspect in general. To go further a male human is a class of humans- but also it's an aspect of humanity. Trust me, my logic is clearly more accepting than your treating it. I could care less about your identifying. Really don't know what you're trying to attack me for.