{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/29/2015 3:05:38 PM
2
smh. you do realize the only reason its good is bc they nerfed everything else?
mida wouldnt stand a chance if pulse rifles didnt get nerfed
English
-
[quote]smh. you do realize the only reason its good is bc they nerfed everything else? mida wouldnt stand a chance if pulse rifles didnt get nerfed[/quote] So true. It's pretty amazing how often people completely disregard sound logic.
-
Actually you don't seem to realize that's it always been a great scout rifle. I've had the gun since week three, it three shot headshots all the time and is easily one of the most balanced scouts in the game.
-
it still wasnt competitive during the hand cannon meta or the pulse rifle meta
-
It four shot people. I could get 3 out of 4 headshots in before Thorn got me, so if enemy didn't get two headshots in a head to head, I would win (probably die from burn, but that's the gun doing all the work, not the user)
-
So what you're saying is, the most balanced gun in the game should be nerfed just because everything else in the game has been nerfed? That logic seems pretty flawed to me. Mida has literally been the same gun since the game released. Always strong but always underrated because something was always equally or slightly as strong.
-
Edited by NYDIBS: 12/29/2015 4:04:40 PMI didnt say that. I just think its stupid to just say the weapon hasnt changed. Pulse rifles didnt get buffed when they became the meta, hand cannons got nerfed. Mida is now the meta bc pulse rifles got nerfed. If anything, I think pulse rifles and auto rifles need a slight buff, another 0.04% to balance it out again.
