originally posted in:Offtopic Intelligence
View Entire Topic
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/us/san-bernardino-attacks-us-visa-process-tashfeen-maliks-remarks-on-social-media-about-jihad-were-missed.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share
This Muslim chick passed through how many background checks before being allowed into America?
[quote]Tashfeen Malik, who with her husband carried out the massacre in San Bernardino, Calif., passed three background checks by American immigration officials as she moved to the United States from Pakistan. None uncovered what Ms. Malik had made little effort to hide — that she talked openly on social media about her views on violent jihad.
She said she supported it. And she said she wanted to be a part of it.[/quote]
The vetting process for refugees is foolproof! You have to be an idiot to think that a terrorist could slip by a process that takes over a year to complete!
This chick made it blatantly obvious that she wanted to terrorize some ish in the name of her God, and we still couldn't see what she truly was. A [u]terrorist.[/u]
LOL. Oh liberals, when will you learn?
-
Edited by tjustie: 12/14/2015 9:35:47 PM[quote]But the vetting for refugees is a separate, longer and more rigorous process than the checks for K-1 and most other immigrant visas. And there is an extra layer of scrutiny for Syrians, who are referred to a national security and fraud office at the Department of Homeland Security for a final look. In that last step, officers can include a social media search, federal officials said.[/quote] The article also mentioned this, which is rather important I think. It does surprise me that they don't check social media for normal visas though.