{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/17/2015 3:15:11 PM
21
-
10/10 ign would bang again.
-
[quote]10/10 ign would bang again.[/quote]
-
Yeah like those are totally reliable with all COD games getting 9's even though they suck
-
Edited by Corrupted Minds: 11/18/2015 1:49:17 AMAW was trash but Ghosts was decent in my opnion
-
I hope you aren't serious. The Multiplayer was broken as hell and the campaign was really bad
-
You also have a built in review site in your head, it's pretty neat.
-
I don't think he does. Sounds like he lets someone else make all the decisions.
-
Unfortunately that's the way with most gamers nowadays.
-
I give Fallout 4 a 9/10 in my opinion
-
Ign really?
-
Got a problem m8?
-
IGN LOL
-
Better than Metacritic
-
IGN gets paid for their reviews, how else would COD get higher than an 8 every year. Also remember the too much water thing?
-
AW deserved a 4, Ghosts a 6
-
Gamespot review is below, they gave it a 7/10...
-
And destiny got a 6.5 and millions of people still play it
-
That's because the majority of the player base, don't realise they're addicted to the dopamine hit their brain gets from an epic loot drop...
-
I can live with a 7/10
-
-
IGN Hahah same company that gives every CoD ( including Ghosts and AW) over 8 every year
