Star Wars Battlefail currently has a 73 on metacritic with more mixed reviews than positive. It was obvious that this game was a cash grab lacking mode's.
It's sad to know that E.A. have the licence, the day's of great Star Wars games like KotOR are long gone.
What score do you guys think Star Wars Battlefront will achieve on metacritic over the next few days? My prediction is a 66 overall...
EDIT: PS4 version has a 74 overall. Link below...
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/star-wars-battlefront
EDIT 2: PC version is the lowest rated of all versions, the graphics will be vastly superior on PC. It currently has a 70. Link below....
http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/star-wars-battlefront
Here are the numbers, look at how low the player base is for a new release. Star Wars BattleFail definitely flopped...
Shout out to DeusFever for bringing these stats to my attention...
http://swbstats.com/
-
It really didn't, also you Trust reviews sooooo
-
I love the game. True Star Wars fans would enjoy it for the feeling that's captured when playing. It's all a matter of opinion I suppose, though.
-
I stopped reading when I saw Metacritic
-
7/10 is good. 6/10 & up is classed as good.
-
Metacritic is broken anyway, what with some reviewers getting more sway than others.
-
I think people are could sing the user review with the critic review. MetaCritic has a user review for users to rate a game, and a professional review where they take every review site and average the score.
-
Gr8 game
-
Games amazing imo. Really find myself wanting to go back and play it over destiny every day since its been out. And this is coming from a destiny fanboy that hasn't bought any of the other games released lately and only wanted this for nostalgic reasons. Some of the most fun I've had in a long time actually.
-
Awww shit man, seriously? Some random dude I don't know didn't like it, that obviously means I won't like it either :(
-
A 73 is not really a flop but means the game is not that great overall. One thing to keep in mind is that meta critic is a bad source for game reviews. Most reviewers on Meta Critic are not actually gamer, I read a fallout review from a critic on Meta critic and the guy said he played the game for 1 hr and it was awful, he gave it a bad score. a proper review of a game requires at lest 4-5 hrs at min and even at that it still really only gives a general idea of a game overall.
-
73 is a 7/10, that is a good game, it isn't an AMAZING game, but a good one
-
Edited by Doctor Electric: 11/19/2015 6:07:21 AM73/100 doesn't make a game a flop, a -blam!-ing 40/100 is a flop. 73 is basically a mediocre game that many will like and others will not.
-
I shall judge it how I like, and so far, it's really fun imo.
-
Have you played it yet? And since when does metacritic's opinion carry any weight?
-
meta critic is not a valid source
-
Edited by ALoafOfBagels: 11/19/2015 5:23:37 AM[quote]metacritic[/quote] That means nothing. And how about you play it yourself rather than jumping to conclusions with metacritic
-
Edited by Aarchon_Priest: 11/18/2015 5:21:00 PMSo what? If you're a real Star Wars fan you'll love. You're just following the critics like mindless sheep.[spoiler]at least it's better than BO3[/spoiler]
-
You seem to dry hump metacritic reviews. You said the same thing about Fallout and it did amazing.
-
Since when a 73 is a bad score it has more positive than mixed and there 0 bad reviews. For online only multiplayer game I would say it's very successful.
-
It's not that bad
-
If they put in a 'Classic Mode' game option, I'm sure a lot of people would be incredibly happy. I know I would be...
-
Stop trusting metacritic
-
Lego Star Wars is better than this game lol
-
That is a terrible score. But then again, a terrible game aswell.
-
You have been diced
-
Eh, doubt it flopped but that's not good either way.