{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/14/2015 4:17:31 AM
1
It likely wouldn't have happened at all of they new people were armed.
English
-
Not in this manner, no. That's not to say they wouldn't have hatched a different plot, but beyond that it's pure speculation.
-
There would be no plot but to directly attack which is not how Guerrila fighters like ISIS operate.
-
As American terror attacks prove, an armed populace does not act as ultimate deterrent.
-
Edited by Nverted-Angel: 11/14/2015 4:27:57 AMIf anything it's quite the opposite as American terror attacks take place in 'gun fee zones'.
-
There would exist similar places in an armed Paris so the song remains the same
-
There shouldn't be places like that. I never said France should be like the US is right now
-
There is never going to be a society where all men are armed 24/7, that just isn't practical or realistic. And even then, certain attacks, like those done in stealth, can't really be averted by firearms until it's too late.
-
And the point is ISIS doesn't work like that, if even 1/8 of the populous was armed this wouldn't have happened at this severity
-
ISIS don't have a particular tactic as, as far as their foreign operations go, they are not a singular entity. In Iraq and Syria they're a conventional army, elsewhere, they're whatever they need to be.
-
They're Guerrila fighters.
-
Guerrilla fighters tend not to use tanks and heavy weapons as ISIS employ. They fight (and often beat) the Iraqi military by conventional means.
-
I'm speaking of in foreign affairs.
-
Terrorism and guerrilla warfare are two very different things
