That's the general gist of what I'm trying to say. Although I personally believe that even a culmination of numbers can only give a general identifier of "skill".
English
-
Someone else pretty much said it perfectly earlier in this thread. Statistics can give a general idea of skill, but to really figure out a person's true skill you need to have a field test. I agree with that, most if not all statistics can be padded or fabricated to make something look better than it truly is, but a field test will remove all doubt
-
In addition, sometimes some stats can just get affected by poor luck. For example, every once in a while it feels like every corner I turn is a super to the face.