{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by brandorobot:
11/4/2015 11:38:24 PM
18
Player Walks Through Fallout 4 Map In An Attempt To Measure It
But it supposedly only takes 10 minutes and change to traverse..
What do you think of this?
-
Pete Hines tweeted something like "this game isn't a cross country running simulator, I don't know what you expected"
-
1 ReplyDid he really just say "10 minutes and change"?
-
3 RepliesIt's supposed to be about 2x or 3x times the size of fallout 3. Also heard it was going to be bigger than Skyrim. Honestly I felt Skyrim was rather large.
-
3 RepliesIf it's the one I'm thinking of, he actually sprinted. Secondly, Kotaku is an awful news source.
-
24 RepliesDestiny has small 'free roaming' maps. Everyone bitches. Fallout has one small free roaming map. Every one commends it. [spoiler]Come then warrior, have your resolution[/spoiler]
-
1 ReplyGreat so now we are complaining that we can't walk longer digitally [spoiler]first world probs[/spoiler]
-
2 RepliesEdited by TrAB418: 11/9/2015 1:51:13 PMHere's a better question. How many locations are there?
-
5 Replies10 minutes of just straight walking sounds pretty big to me. doesn't really speak to how much explorable space there is. some areas might be entirely different instances that you can't actually travel to on foot. there could be underground stuff as well.
-
It's on old gen so this may have something to do with the small scope. Then again, we don't know how dense or whether there's lots of underground stuff.
-
1 ReplyAs long as it's packed full of content I don't mind.
-
7 RepliesI think that's fine honestly. As the writer noted, the size of main map has no bearing on how much content there is contained within it. For example, there could be dozens of huge cave or sewer systems hidden below the surface or massive buildings to explore. I'd rather have a smaller map that is more densely populated with content than a bigger map that takes forever to find something interesting.
-
5 RepliesEdited by Tuxx: 11/5/2015 9:49:21 AMI think that's a sigh of relief personally. I don't want a world so big that I don't want to explore, and I don't want to spend half the game walking. There's a such thing as too big.
-
7 RepliesI thought it was about the size of skyrim?
-
This only shows the perimeter of the map, there could be a lot less or a lot more space inside the map
-
5 RepliesProbably not the full build, just a guess.
-
2 RepliesEdited by Zanhattan: 11/4/2015 10:29:54 PMNot only is that quite small, but he seemed to be running through mostly barren environments. I like the atmosphere though. Despite this, it doesn't take into account interiors and such.
-
1 ReplyI've read that they were off and that the map is supposedly around 7,000 times the size they suggested.
-
Boomp
