{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/24/2015 5:08:45 AM
2
it wasn't the arc damage that attracted people to Fatebringer, it was an overall great gun. The arc damage was just a bonus that only help against captains and the rare arc burn nightfall.
English
-
For me it was arc
-
[quote]it wasn't the arc damage that attracted people to Fatebringer, it was an overall great gun. The arc damage was just a bonus that only help against captains and the rare arc burn nightfall.[/quote] Not. True. At. All. The number on comment on topics like "check out the roll I got on_____" is "Not nearly as good as firefly, outlaw, and arc damage". Arc damage was THEE primary focus of fatebringer.
-
Fang had arc damage only used it for the burn and when I felt like it Fatebringer was my go to for everything PvE So that's not true it's like arc was just a bonus on it
-
[quote]Fang had arc damage only used it for the burn and when I felt like it Fatebringer was my go to for everything PvE So that's not true it's like arc was just a bonus on it[/quote] Last sentence proves my point. Whenever fatebringer was beat by any gun, that "bonus on it" is what was thrown at people.
-
My favorite hand cannon was the chance if it had fatebringers perks I would of used it and put fatebringer to rest but sadly it has only one good perk =[
