{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:The Ashen Conflux
10/21/2015 11:12:09 PM
1
Yet violence was against what the Traveler stands for. When the Traveler atrempt an incredibly violent act, it just begets more violence. If the Traveler had followed its nature, the Darkness may have never become this force it is within the Hive.
English
-
Edited by Oak_Khan: 10/21/2015 11:26:37 PMWhen was it stated that the traveler was against violence? Every race it helps it also arms
-
The Traveler itself is against violence. It doesn't destroy one race to bring another up. It creates Golden Ages and utopias wherever it goes. There was only one known time in the existence of the Traveler where the Traveler itself commits an act of violence: the syzygy. Otherwise, it relies on the races it brought up to defend it or fend for themselves.
-
It's not about making one race overcome the other, it's about having the power to defend yourself from evil aka the darkness. Every utopia needs a means to defend itself.
