{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by ExcalliburFallS:
10/18/2015 8:09:35 PM
35
Battlefront or BO3, What's better?
Which is better? I'm not gonna answer it will make it a bit uneven but I like battlefront more than black ops3, I did play both betas and I have to say they're spectacular. I like battlefront just because all the features you can do. I mean who doesn't want to be Darth vader?!
-
Blops 3 looks pretty nice, I must admit, and I don't even play cod
-
Battlefront for sure. BO3 is just another CoD, they make a new CoD every year, fans have been waiting for Battlefront forever, and on top of that never has there been a game that captures Star Wars as good as Battlefront does imo.
-
Battlefront feels a little causalized, but the pure awe of feeling in the Star Wars movie that's why I'm going all into this game.
-
I liked BO3 because it gave away like 75% of its MP
-
Battlefront is better, but COD will sell more because..well its COD. Not excited for BO3, BO2 was ok, ghost was shit, and AW was complete and utter garbage. Now, if activision were to remaster the modernwarfare trilogy, ID SPEND EVERY THING ON IT.
-
I've recently been on the CoD hate train but I actually enjoyed the Bo3 beta more than the Battlefront Beta. I've played all of the past battlefield games and this seems like it'll be fun in the beginning and then get boring once you hit a certain point. Same thing happened to me in Bf4 and hardline.
-
BO3 looks like it might be the best CoD ever. All hail Treyarch. I absolutely love anything Star Wars so I'll definitely be getting Battlefront.
-
BO3 beta was great, actually looking forward to it and I haven't liked a Cod since BO2.
-
I'd rather get aggressive dinosaur AIDS then buy another Cod
-
Niether
-
Hopefuly EA doesnt screw up, their beta was awful. Black ops 3 on the other hand had a near flawless beta other than a few server bugs
-
People endlessly bitch about Battlefront's lack of features, change in design focus, mechanics and more. Still wins in the poll. This forum is -blam!-ed.
-
1 Replyyou mean battleFIELD with lasers?
-
I hope the zombies will be good
-
Edited by dmn1981: 10/19/2015 4:57:51 PMAlthough bo3 wasn't terrible ( the beta) it is still no where near as good as cod once was ... In my opinion the series needs to go back to its roots if it is to compete against so many other great shooters out there
-
Both are bad but I dare say cod will probably give you more play time if you must choose one of them
-
Pig shit or horse shit? Neither.
-
2 RepliesThey are both overhyped, overpriced piles of cows**t. So yeah. I guess I like both equally.
-
4 RepliesBattlefront because only pros can win as Rebels. #MostOfY'allSuckAsRebels
-
12 RepliesSWBF will go stale after two weeks when people finally realise the game lacks content. Black ops 3 is one of the most innovative cod games in years, is packed full of content. Co-op campaign, zombies, multiplayer with new modes. #RonPerlman BO3 has more maps, modes than SWBF. Don't be fooled by E.A.
-
1 ReplyPlayed both betas, and BO3 was a lot better, and they care about their community. They actually made patches during the beta and balanced things, which is admirable. Battlefront just felt very unfinished, and it's beta was a lot closer to its release. However, I'm still getting both, but I would honestly recommend BO3 if you can only get one.
-
Black ops 3 because the multiplayer beta was longer than Battlefront's.
-
2 RepliesEdited by alghasfohsafovah: 10/18/2015 8:14:18 PMB-b-but Zombies is so co- *Darth Vader walks in and chokes the CoD fanboy* I FIND YOUR LACK OF TASTE DISTURBING But yeah, I liked both, but I'm leaning more towards Battlefront.
-
This is a tough one.
-
5 RepliesBlack ops 3 because, Marshawn Lynch
-
Edited by Tu Chocolate Caliente: 10/18/2015 11:46:53 PMBlack ops 3 because atleast that one was fun as hell.
