{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Quokkas:
10/15/2015 7:39:56 AM
1
Don't people use Imago Loop because Fatebringer is capped and Imago Loop is at year 2 levels? If Fatebringer were still as strong as it was, I suspect the vast majority would go with it, rather than Imago Loop as you'd have to wait for a good roll anyway
English
-
You might be right, but I still think a lot of people (myself included) would still be really interested in it just for a change of pace. It could very easily be the better PvP choice (FB's perks aren't exectly fantastic for Crucible), and any roll with Firefly would be pretty much Fatbringer 2.0 for the PvE fans.
-
I really think you are the only one upset about the loss of y1 weapons that would try something for a change of pace. Most of them just don't like change and want their thorn for Pvp, gally for pve... You I think just miss your collection and strats behind the guns, which I respect, but I am on the other side of opinion. At this point I am half in the bag at 3:50 am and need to get off these forums, good food for thought guys there was actually some intelligent debate here
-
Yeah I agree a lot of people would probably try it regardless of caps on year 1. But I think the lesser weapons should be considered also. I mean, if I were Bungie, I really wouldn't bother making all these uncommon/rare weapons if people would not bother playing with them (if the cap didn't exist). I may not like the decision, but I kind of understand how they want people to use the year 2 equipment. For me personally, some of those year 1 rare weapons were more interesting than some of the legendaries, which is unfortunate.
