{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/30/2015 12:25:27 PM
4
You're going to get a lot of titans replying to this.
I can see both sides of the story, they want an effective ranged super, but we all want it balanced.
So why can't they do it like golden gun where you get 3 or maybe with an exotic helmet you get 4?
That would seem a fair way to deal with it rather than hammer spam for the duration of the super.
I mean who'd be happy to see a voidwalker have the ability to chuck purple junk for the same duration as a hammer of sol. He'd be shitting orbs all over the map and op as hell.
So all in all I don't think bungie have thought this one through properly or even play tested this?
Or maybe they are truly just daft!!?
English
-
It's just not as accurate as golden gun. Seriously if a Titan throws a hammer jump up and you'll probably survive that one now he can get you with the next one that's true, but the fact that if enemies jump or shadestep away makes you lose a hammer then having 3-4 would suck. Golden gun is damn near instant and has better range. The only thing I would want is for a golden gun to be able to be able to one shot a Titan. So buff golden gun and leave the sunbreakers where they are.
-
Well you're talking about defense values are you not? Radiance with ram could tank 2 gg shots before ram was nerfed I think. Buffing that would apply to pve also so I'm doubtful they'd ever do that as bungie have already displayed they seem to lack the ability to differentiate between pvp and pve when it comes to weapon balancing. All in all though it needs a bit of work put into it.
-
Honestly I feel like golden gun should be buffed in PVE also. It's ridiculous to use 3 golden gun shots to take down a major.
-
Yeah that's a fair point I suppose.
