{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/29/2015 5:47:04 AM
2
That's probably because they were more hunters back in the day when arcblade and golden gun rocked the crucible.
Now that there's so many hunters, they've probably all tried the nightstalker class thus raking in more kills with it lol
English
-
Edited by Fenderslasher: 9/29/2015 6:19:54 AMThird time I addressed this, read my other rebuttals pls. The only time that hunters had even a slightly significant higher percent of the population was within the first month or two of the game and that cannot statistically account for the difference. Even if we were to assume that no new players began to play after the population equalized and we were to assume that they had a two month lead by about 20% kills,which is generous I think, then we can apply that to the total year, so divide that into the months and we only get a 3-4% margin of error. Not a 50% margin of difference as the the result suggest. We have enough info to control for the other variables. I'm telling you they just get twice as many kills per super in average, you can't beat the math I challenge you to go get the statistics and review them for yourself.
-
Edited by Fenderslasher: 9/29/2015 5:57:56 AMClass distribution is almost 33%, 33%, 33% usage in pvp with a small margin of error. There is no case of there being proof that there were actually more hunters than Titans at any time whatsoever disproving any argument of the sort. It's an even distribution. The shear fact that hunters are making twice as many kills per capita and still calling for nerfs to other classes is absolutely disgraceful. And it's not just the super, it's the melee and the grenades as well. It's better than the other two across the board no matter how you slice it. Edit: each of the new classes is randomly tracked and is clocking in at roughy 6% of the total population each also proving that it's not a case of Titans and warlocks are still using the old supers and therefor not competing adequately.
-
True. I've mostly seen 4-5 hunters in Rumble during y1. It was almost impossible to come out on top because of golden gun back in the day lol Warlocks have a much larger reach with their melee with the stormcaller. But hunters can basically throw theirs wherever they want. Even adding poison or the cloaking ability. They even get an enhanced motion tracker as a perk which makes it even better to predict where the enemy will be. Not to mention, tethering people in supers cancels them. Even while you're in a super and even get near it, it'll tether to you and cancel it. A super that cancels a super and also kills/gives bonus damage is the better super imo. I just love the Warlock to much. haha
