Yeah this argument makes zero sense. Making up for? What? Everytime I see this argument being used I just imagine a 10 year old throwing a tantrum "It's not fair!". Nobody wants the super to be bad the armor is simply too much that's it. I know you're more than likely going to insult/ call me biased but really think about that argument. Why would you want to bestow a pain onto others when it was done to yourself? Argument is purely emotionally driven with no sort of logic to guide it.
English
-
The armor is no more than what what you get when using FoH, NB, or BD. Oh, by the way, an argument is the presentation of facts. Which I have, and you clearly don't.
-
You also presented no facts and I'm almost convinced that you are a troll
-
The facts are right there in front of your face. Not my fault if you're too blind to see reason.
-
Ah so either dull or troll either way [spoiler]muted[/spoiler]
-
Ah, so either an idiot or a moron. Either way... [spoiler]I'm right. [/spoiler] Oh well. Some kids would rather run away than be forced to face reality.
-
Bd can't survive gg or high impact sniper. FOH unless with unstoppable takes a gg or high impact headshot
-
Edited by redshirt4life: 9/26/2015 4:37:33 AMNo super can survive a high impact sniper, save for a striker with unstoppable. FoH and NB both can tank a GG shot, and technically so can WoD. Get your facts straight.
-
nonva bomb can only eat a gg shot if thy have the ahamkara helmet and sunsingers and hammer of sol both can eat headshots and gg shots