The court system in America in real life work by having unexperienced people told of a situation and informed of all the details they need to know in order to make an unbiased decision. Why would u want a bank robber to decide if the shop lifter is innocent or guilty? I want a person who is not attached to the situation at all to be the person to make judgement on said situation. Note I did not say an uninformed person but an unattached/experienced person.
English
-
So... you want somebody who plays destiny. But isnt a titan. And has never seen one? I understand your example, im just not quite sure how it works in this frame. Wouldnt somebodies opinion whose used the hammer and been hammered be worth more? Law is one thing, game balance is another. You do make a lot of sense though.