Isnt that a bad thing?
People who never play a game deciding things about the game?
English
-
Edited by ImpatientGamer0: 9/25/2015 7:47:12 PMYou don't need to eat poison to know it bad for you. You don't need to play a game to know its bad. In the real world we can use things like statistics and feedback to make accurate and unbiased judgment on a topic without witnessing it first hand. Most of the destiny community are extremely biased and base things off of "I can deal with it just fine" or "it's not as bad as other things in the game" or "people nerfed Hunter when they said it was op but now people think Sunbreaker is ok only cus it's a Titan". While a professional will simply look at the numbers, see how many kill Titans are getting per super on adverse and how many time they are shut down on adverage and other statistics that will show the unbiased facts.
-
So ypu would rather please people who dont playbthe game? Or am i reading this wrong... I get what your saying, but your saying it horribly. Why would you listen to an unknowing yet unbiased view rather then a knowing yet unbiased?
-
The court system in America in real life work by having unexperienced people told of a situation and informed of all the details they need to know in order to make an unbiased decision. Why would u want a bank robber to decide if the shop lifter is innocent or guilty? I want a person who is not attached to the situation at all to be the person to make judgement on said situation. Note I did not say an uninformed person but an unattached/experienced person.
-
So... you want somebody who plays destiny. But isnt a titan. And has never seen one? I understand your example, im just not quite sure how it works in this frame. Wouldnt somebodies opinion whose used the hammer and been hammered be worth more? Law is one thing, game balance is another. You do make a lot of sense though.