Ok, there's one of the three things I asked you to do that you have attempted to do scorer sky poorly. Get me detailed information on these tests of theirs, then get busy on the other two steps.
And now I see you're attempting a red herring by bringing up evolution and the Big Bang. Not only is it a logical fallacy to attack these things when we weren't talking about them, but it's also stupid because there is abundant evidence for both.
To reach the level of theory an idea has to have a high level of supporting evidence.
English
-
Sorry but I can't put a life time of research into I have a life A good life because of God Because really I have been stuff to do than bash someone's beliefs on an Internet forum
-
Edited by BenjyX55: 9/24/2015 10:22:08 PMThen you have to site someone else's or admit that you don't have enough evidence to make a claim. That's how science works.
-
To be honest I don't I don't need to
-
And why is that?
-
Because Your not my mom and you can't tell me what to do
-
I'm only telling you what science dictates. It's funny how quickly people, when met with scientific scrutiny, make the jump from "I can prove God" to " I don't need to prove God because I have faith."
-
I never said that last part
-
I never said you did. However, you did claim that you could prove God, then when I asked you to back up your claim you said you didn't need to.
-
I did back up my claim Either way God exists in my eyes Honestly I don't need to prove to you anything so I'm done I know that God is real So I'm done Cause like I said before I have better things todo than bash others beliefs
-
And there we are, you just said the second piece. Here's a piece of advice kid: instead of picking fights you can't win, acknowledge that the other guy can kick your ass and just keep your head down.