{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/24/2015 8:37:14 PM
6
You can't prove something " isn't op. You can't prove a negative and the burden of proof is on the person making the claim
English
-
Please prove it's balanced. : ) Is it possible now?
-
That's his point. He's calling out the people that are defending the subclass, asking them to prove how it ISNT op. Just asking for their weaknesses, lel scrub
-
Edited by bnarsty: 9/24/2015 9:12:39 PMYour comment makes no sense. That's not his point or Mine. You literally can't prove something isn't op
-
You can't, but OP is still asking [quote]the plebs who say sunbreaker isn't OP[/quote] to provide evidence to their claim.
-
But in demanding for them to give proof he makes claims that demand him to give proof scrub
-
He's asking them to follow burden of proof. People asking for he nerf have given their reasons as to how the super IS op, and the OP is asking the people that say it SHOULDNT be nerfed to respond with evidence.
