{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Tinker (Chloe):
12/15/2015 6:59:32 PM
12
Thorn in year 2?
The purpose of the poll is simple, to test another player's opinion that all the community wants a year two version of Thorn. This post will be later edited when Data starts to be released by you guys voting, but also feel free to post your own opinion below.
Edit 1: It would seem that at first the poll was very option 1 heavy, but it seems to have changed now to be much more balanced. That is an interesting development.
~ Joshua TCB
-
NECROBUMP
-
Where's the I don't care?
-
Why would you want a year two thorn. Thorn is dead. Everything good about it is gone its now a worthless piece of junk taking up vault space just because it "exotic".
-
1 ReplyIt should make it into year 2, if only for the fact that it was such a sought after and hated weapon alike. Even if it was dumbed down to a more modest level, I'd still like to see it as a 290 drop. Love it or hate it, it's a unique weapon now that has a history in the game... It deserves a nod for being such a weapon.
-
[quote]The purpose of the poll is simple, to test another player's opinion that all the community wants a year two version of Thorn. This post will be later edited when Data starts to be released by you guys voting, but also feel free to post your own opinion below.[/quote] But due to the hassle it caused in crucible it should only be allowed in PVE.
-
2 RepliesThorn should stay in year one. It caused a crucible meta where the only way to compete was getting a thorn, last word, or a hawk moon. I used hopscotch pilgrim during this time and didn't do to bad because of the two burst headshot kill BUT, if thorn is brought up to year two it could cause another Mets and ruin the perfect state crucible is in.
-
-
2 RepliesOk I can see where bungie is coming from by wanting to take old OP exotics out and make us use new ones.. but they are approaching this situation all wrong. I can understand why legendaries don't have a year 2 but these are EXOTICS. They should always be atleast be usable in the newest content. Maybe not the very best like year 1 but atleast still usable. Seriously bungie think about the community. Yes I like thorn. But I love all exotics and the way that some of them are USELESS in the new content is really unfair to the people who like those weapons. And even without the exotics being taken away, people will still explore new weapons - you know why ? Because they are NEW. ( and why nerf galla it's not gonna be usable in year 2 ? Why buff hard light and necro if it's not gonna be usable on year 2 ? Seriously .. exotics are exotics . They are meant to be the best in the game and should always be an option to use. No matter if it's year 1 or 20. Please re consider. Xbox 1 - Aura Voltzz
-
-
Cant wait to see what people use in trials, i know ill still be using tlw
-
7 RepliesEdited by Rho'gath: 9/22/2015 3:30:25 PMGonna say yer, seriously it's now a 3 shot to kill with headshots now (which is standard for all Hand Cannons) yet at the same time it's far more useable in PvE. Anyone that complains is just salty over past trauma
-
I used Thorn in PvE mostly, works great on Fallen cptn's shield
