{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/20/2015 10:22:22 PM
1
Why don't you look it up? You know I can't honestly explain without breaking the rules, right?
English
-
Why don't I look what up? Aren't I agreeing with you?
-
I couldn't tell, we're you?
-
Don't you think I am, now that I have implied it and all? Have you taken psychology before?
-
Well, can't you tell by my previous comment that it's one of my favorite subjects?
-
Isn't that why I asked you if I can safely make that assumption? Is that what you plan to do as a career or is it more of a fun class?
-
Can't I like astronomy and psychology?
-
Why not? Those are both somewhat different fields, what attracts you about each one?
-
Doesn't the universe go on (nearly) Forever? Can we possibly know anything significant when there is infinite Knowedge? Doesn't the unknown have an allure?
-
Why do you bound an infinite space? Which do you enjoy more?
-
Why bound infinite space, if their are no bounds?
-
Isn't that what I am saying, that in your context it seemed as though you were bounding something infinite when you said nearly?
-
Is their Infinity? Or it it simply a mean to describe what is beyond our comprehension?
-
If a graph approaches a value we are unable to attain, but simply gets closer and closer to it, can we assume that the graph continues infinitely without touching the graph? By definition, isn't infinity simply something that never ends and continues forever?
-
Burnished Infinity achievable? Can our minds comrahend it if it was?
-
Why wouldn't it be? Can anything truly end or begin?
-
But isn't every end a beginning? Doesn't the end of a republic lead to the founding of an empire? Doesn't the end of a tyranny lead to a the founding of a country? Doesn't the end of a large war bring on peace? A quite simple euphemism: Isn't the bursting of one light bulb the birth of a new one?
-
Isn't that where we stray from science and travel into philosophy? Does my wording mean I agree to an extent?
-
Isn't it often that simple philosophies apply in science?
-
Isn't it true that science can be proven, but many deep philosophical ideas cannot?
-
Isn't philosophy less of fact but more of a moral Code, comparable to Buddhism?
-
Doesn't it depend on what kind of philosophy and philosophical ideas we are talking about?
-
Well, what philosophy are we talking about? There is more than one?
-
Isn't there philosophy about morals, and philosophies that work to explain what science does?
-
Are you admitting that philosophies can explain concepts of science?
-
Aren't I saying philosophies attempt to explain those concepts, and some may be more plausible than others? Why do you say admitting, as if I were arguing something else against this idea?
