{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/10/2015 3:28:01 PM
1
[quote]star wars lore: WE ACTUALLY USE SCIENCE[/quote]
What are you smoking?
Star wars is no more based in science than Halo is.
English
-
Really? Name ANYTHING from star wars; ill find the science behind it for you. Halo: unexplained and flat out wrong science in that series: 1 halo array range is 1 galaxy: if there are 17 halo arrays with 25,000 lightyear blast diameter thats 2,000,000x the diameter of the milky way---> the andromeda galaxy is in that radius There IS NO statement on what the Halo blast wave energy is or how fast it moves. All energy can be diverted, blocked, dissipated, or turned into matter so HALO blast waves WOULD NOT even work as directed in the series; not to mention once that energy came in contact with its target it would be spent which means any life form behind enough other life forms would also survive the blast wave, its just a question of how many life forms one of the energy particles can destroy. Stuff like that. Dont even get me started on fore runners and precursors.
-
Where does star wars explain lightsabers or the death star or energy shields or ftl travel or literally anything. Remember, whatever you find has to come directly from star wars and be canon. And here's why you are wrong anyways: George Lucas just made up all the base technology of star wars.
-
Edited by DarthBrando: 9/10/2015 6:50:38 PMHe also worked with publishing houses making encyclopedias to explain the junk; Most of the star wars wikia and wikipedias are sighted from the (STILL CANNON cuz their content is just from the movies); The del rey + lucas books published encyclopedias such as; "Star Wars: new essential guide to weapons and technology" by W. Haden Blackman with illustrations by Ian Fullwood published by Del Rey in conjunction with Lucas Books. If the book has the; starwars.com logo on it and is of the movies or clone wars tv show or rebels tv show or force awakens or rogue one---> it is still cannon.
-
Just because they explained them afterwards doesn't mean they were based in real science.
-
That is a good and fair point; but at least they went back and applied the science to it on some of the stuff and YEA on some of the stuff THEY DID write the science to it WHEN THEY DESIGNED IT (like some of the fighters and tech); There is a blueprint book that is a reprinting OF THE ORIGINAL design work for some of the ships; THE UNSIGNED EDITIONS cost 700 USD due to limited reprint run; the signed versions sold retail for 1200 USD + Some of the ORIGINAL artist concepts had plenty of pieces of the tech explained. [Lucas used hyperspace as FTL; the hyperspace theory was around A GOOD BIT before star wars. Star wars ship to ship warfare is based off of NAVAL BATTLESHIP ship to ship warfare with attack fighter (planes) support/warfare. The rebel alliance used unconventional guerrilla warfare vs the empire's police state and occupation force based tactics] All of the stuff in [ ] + more was CONSIDERED and taken into account when making the original movies and designed/worked in that way before the movies were made.
