1) You guys missed an opportunity for some actually interesting story. Imagine if you would, at some very early point of our encounter with the dreadnaught our ghost gets damaged and due to the repairs it's voice and parts of its personality is altered.
[b][u]I just think that would have been cool.[/u][/b]
And make more sense than erasing all that history/work that had been done.
2) watched some of the clips of the new voice that had replaced the old. Most notably the "we have woken the hive" bit, in comparison it was awful I literally cringed several times during that cutscene. The emotions were just off and poorly timed. This causes one [b][u]glaring[/u][/b] issue; which is, a lack of drawing the audience into the story. With North the ghost just seems to be reading from a script and it shows. With Dinklage the monologue scripted feel doesn't exist the ghost had [b][u]personality[/u][/b]
3) This is more of a common sense review of the overall situation. "You get what you pay for", while I'm sure Dinklage would have cost substantially more he is a professional actor who is skilled in not only bringing characters to life but also making an impactful connection with the audience. In the long run, Dinklage I would've enjoyed; however, with North I kinda hope the ghost doesn't have much to say because the monotone feel will just grate my nerves.
again [b][u]"You get what you pay for"[/u][/b]
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAOpcV2mz40