{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by sayrey89:
9/9/2015 11:06:22 PM
95
FIELD SCOUT, why was it not replace with a different perk?
I usually don't complain about things on the forums, but this in particular pissed me off. I'm not as much pissed about the removal of field scout, more so the fact that they didn't replace it with anything. I now have a good amount of guns with only 2 perks available in the middle tree. Why not replace it with a random perk, I'd take anything other than a perk that does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! Just my two cents, let me know your opinions. Thanks for your time guardians.
**guardian down**
Edit 1: didn't think I would need to clarify this, but extra reserve ammo, in my opinion, is a pointless middle tree perk making it, in my opinion, absolutely pointless.
Edit 3: didn't think I would need to state this, but your armor maxes your reserve ammo and the perks do not stack, therefore field scout=absolutely useless.
Edit 4: would be nice to get some sort of confirmation from someone affiliated with bungie on whether or not this was what they intended to do with field scout.
-
4 RepliesEdited by xj3ewok: 9/9/2015 2:52:36 AMHere's what bungie thought: "Hmmm we need to kill their favorite weapons but not just in pve let's just screw every year one players arsenal to the point they wouldn't even use them in PvP! Hahaha that'll teach them to cry nerf and say deej sucks!!" I'm guessing that was bungies thinking.
