There are also no good arguments against it. Only people like you thinking they're smart and posting things on a bungie thread
English
-
There are plenty of arguments against it. The fact that there are no good arguments to support the existence of God makes it extremely unlikely that he existed.
-
The fact you and all other atheists cant disprove the existence of God in 150 years proves you are just bashing Christians because you're bitter little -blam!-s
-
First off, don't say all atheists bash people for what they believe in. Cause I sure as shit don't give a flying fûck what kind of shit people believe in. And also, don't say atheists couldn't disprove God exists when Christians can't ACTUALLY prove he existed. A book written thousands of years ago is not proof. Sure Jesus may have actually existed, who knows. But I sure as hell don't believe he did any of that shit in the bible. Christians believe in God because they have faith, which is fine with me, but still isn't proof. And faith isn't enough for me to believe in him
-
Two words, Nephilim Skulls
-
How about you send me a credible link to support whatever the -blam!- it is you're talking about?
-
-
1) Not at all a credible source 2) How in the -blam!- so you jump from "unknown human-like skull" to "Angel skull"? That's the problem with you religitards, you bend scientific evidence in your favor without looking at all the facts.
-
Well it's the only site I could click on, and can you explain what it could be other than the Nephilim?
-
What do you mean, the only site you could click on? Are you stupid? And it's probably just a deformed or new species of homosapien-like mammals. I ask you again, how do you jump straight to the conclusion that it's and angle skull? That's -blam!-ing ridiculous.
-
-
Really? That's what you say when I destroy your argument? Don't even try to counter it? Pathetic. Kill yourself.
-
No it's just I was watching it and it's hilarious. And really? Deformed mammal? They found more than one!
-
Ok, so? You were still trying to run away. And you still haven't given me a reason why they could be angel skulls. You're pulling a "we don't know, therefore God" again, idiot. I'm gonna add this argument to the OP, it's just too funny not to share.
-
He gave you multiple links, how is that running away?
-
Thanks for backing me up
-
Anytime
-
Are you stupid? He gave me a link to an unreputable source, and to an unrelated Youtube video. He then proceeded to stop replying to me and the subject at hand. That's called running away.
-
He didnt run away he probably got tired of your shit (ya know how you just insult Christians and dont even acknowledge the argument but rather just run around ranting about Christianity being fake). And yes those were fine sources.
-
How? It's not at all reputable. You're in grade 9, dumbass. You just admitted he ran away, by the way. You're severely autsitic. Please stop. It's making me sad to have to destroy someone like you so hard.
-
>can't make logical argument >ignores all points >runs away 20% of the time >resorts to insults
-
What points did I ignore? List them for me here. Saying that you're in grade 9 is a fact, not an insult. Please, continue to bump my post for me.
-
Because the bible says they existed, and we find skulls with half human dna, that is perfect, because angels are half human
-
No, the DNA wasn't half human, it was "partially human". Stop inferring things. Bananas have a 50% similar DNA sequence to humans, does that mean bananas are angels too? Dumbass.
-
K, but bananas have no physical similarities to humans The skulls do, and yes they are partially human, that proves a lot, you know what, you have ears yet you do not hear, you have eyes and you will not see, bye God loves you no matter what, but he is so disappointed in you
-
Blah blah blah, you're still not providing any reason that these could be angel skulls other than "they're partially human". So are monkeys. If we had said that everytime we found a new species of bipedal apes, where would we be now? Stop being so ignorant, kid.